On Apr 1, 2012, at 1:57 PM, Robert Raszuk wrote: > Hi Eric, > > > BGP is a great soft-state protocol (where some may define > > ``great'' differently), but I don't currently tweet or update my fb > > status over it. > > While I agree with 99% of what you said today on the list (especially > pointing out need for solid requirements to document what sidr is trying to > achieve)
Great, thanks! I don't want to lose that high order bit! But, I don't want to ignore ya either. I'll send an off-list response for the below. :) Eric > I am not sure why you call BGP soft-state. > > For me soft-state protocol is RSVP which requires refresh otherwise state > invalidates. BGP does not require refresh. > > If that would not be enough BGP is soon to become completely "hard state" if > one would implement > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-uttaro-idr-bgp-persistence-01 > > Best, > R. > _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
