>that's also flawed.
>You should be able to sign anything that you can.
>
>Suppose you receive it from an ibgp peer that sourced it but didn't sign it.
>
>--
>Jakob Heitz.
>

What a BGPSEC router does when "originating" a new BGPSEC update
is covered in Section 4.1. You are right -- the router can receive
a prefix route (without an AS path) from an ibgp peer who sourced it, 
and the method of signing that (or any prefix being originated) is in Section 
4.1.
 
The discussion here (and John's comment) is related to text in Section 4.2,
where we discuss what a BGPSEC router does when "propagating" a route 
advertisement. 
"Propagating" connotes here that the update (or route) was received from an 
eBGP peer.

Sriram

_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to