Hey Chris, Yeah, I read that. I know there's a tendency for some people to want to talk about bath houses on this list, but I was going to pass on that.
As for draft-ymbk-bgpsec-rtr-rekeying-00.txt, that draft just points out the inadequacies of either approach and that there is no good solution. My take is that this is indicative of a misalignment between a given architecture and implicit requirements. Sometimes you can't patch the holes in a leaky ship, you need to reassess the requirements. I think the evidence illustrates that this is the case here. Eric ----- Original Message ----- From: Chris Morrow [mailto:morr...@ops-netman.net] Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 09:28 PM To: Osterweil, Eric Cc: 'sandra.mur...@sparta.com' <sandra.mur...@sparta.com>; 'da...@tcb.net' <da...@tcb.net>; 'morrowc.li...@gmail.com' <morrowc.li...@gmail.com>; 'sidr@ietf.org' <sidr@ietf.org>; 'sidr-cha...@tools.ietf.org' <sidr-cha...@tools.ietf.org>; 'sidr-...@tools.ietf.org' <sidr-...@tools.ietf.org> Subject: Re: [sidr] RPKI and private keys (was RE: Interim Meeting Draft Agenda: 04-30-2012 (April 30, 2012))) On 05/04/2012 08:59 PM, Osterweil, Eric wrote: > His point is NOT addressed by any draft in the wg (since you asked). read randy's mentioned draft? _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
