On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com> wrote: >> * aspath not present - implications? >> - scudder's notes at previous meeting >> perhaps not all the bugs worked out/considerations made >> (not just tools, re-figuring the aspath on entrance/exit, >> are there other places where aspath is used/required? >> confeds is one example?) >> - rbush's noted method to deal with this in confeds > > i am not sure i would clump all of this under aspath, but what the heck. > > can we please add shane's aliasing issue and hopefully this time we can > make it clear in the minutes?
sure thing, your name is there purely for placeholder... with the example that you thought you'd already worked through properly on-list + in-room. > also, the pfx-validate authors are currently polling eachother to ask > for wglc on that doc, and it may be worth putting on the agenda so folk > at the meeting can whack us appropriately. sure, keep in mind we have only 5 hrs. > also, new revs of origin-ops and bgpsec-ops are out. folk may wish to > comment. list comments seem great for that, at least for starters. > on all those docs, i do not think a 'presentation' is warranted. if > folk have not read them, that is their problem and does not warrant the > comic book edition being presented to waste the time of those who have > done their homework. of course, presentations to clarify important and > complex issues would be useful, if there are such. sure. > randy > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > sidr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
