On 20/07/12 2:29 AM, "Randy Bush" <ra...@psg.com> wrote: >> Firstly I think that the ability to specify multiple repositories for the >> TAL is warranted. > > could you explain a bit why? [not implying i have a strong opinion, but > am curious] >
My feeling is that when the RPKI reaches a level of use driven by BGPSEC adoption (ubiquity?) the frequency of fetching the TA listed by the TAL (or TALs) from the volume of relying parties will be of a level that suggests more than just a little ad-hoc engineering. I think it is sensible to then have just enough (but not too much) flexibility in the shape of the cogs to allow engineering options, which may include heterogeneity of repository construction and location. It would be nice (I think) to have this available before it's needed. Cheers Terry
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
