Related to our presentation today, if you are curious about why we have
a lot of invalids:IPv4 http://www.labs.lacnic.net/rpkitools/looking_glass/rest/invalid/cidr/0.0.0.0/0/ For v6 our app does not support to query all the invalids, but you can check with something like: http://www.labs.lacnic.net/rpkitools/looking_glass/rest/all/cidr/2001%3A13c7%3A7002%3A%3A/48/ Or just go to: http://www.labs.lacnic.net/rpkitools/looking_glass/ Regards as On 06/11/2012 12:35, Murphy, Sandra wrote: > We have three new topics to add to the agenda on Friday. > > Carlos Martinez would like to present a new version of > draft-rogaglia-sidr-multiple-publication-points. > > Sue Hares, idr co-chair, would like to request a review of work she is doing > in a limited re-write of the base BGP spec, to fix errata in error handling. > She is aware that error handling can be a source of security issues and wants > to be sure any issues are considered in the re-write. > > I would like to open a discussion with the wg concerning the recently > announced ARIN relying party agreement. I have concerns about this > agreement's impact on the envisioned RPKI architecture and dominant use. I > think the wg needs to consider the potential impact and any potential > mechanisms that would lessen impact. Note that the IETF can not interfere > with ARIN legal decisions! > > These revisions will be reflected in a more detailed agenda shortly. > > --Sandy > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > sidr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr > _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
