On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Murphy, Sandra <sandra.mur...@parsons.com> wrote: > There were four responses to this adoption call, all positive. But four is > not a strong indication of wg wishes here. > > Can others please look at this and speak up as to whether you do or do not > support adoption?
I responded back on 11/27 supporting adoption. Wanted to make sure that my vote still counts... W > > Recall: silence does not indicate interest. > > We give this another two weeks (for people who are taking a Christmas present > holiday in some warm climate). > > Repond by 24 Jan 2014. Please. > > --Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair > ________________________________________ > From: Chris Morrow [morr...@ops-netman.net] > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:39 PM > To: sidr-cha...@tools.ietf.org; sidr wg list > Subject: WG Adoption: draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases > > Howdy gentle WG folks, > The authors of: > <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases-00> > > are interested in starting a WG Adoption call for this piece of scribed > text. It would be good if other folk also agreed about the adoption. > > The abstract says: > "There are a number of critical circumstances where a localized > routing domain needs to augment or modify the Global RPKI. This > document attempts to outline a few of them." > > Please consider this a 'WG Adoption' call, and let's attempt to close > this out by: > 12/9/2013 or 9/12/2013 or Ninth December Twenty-Thirteen or ... you > get the point, see you in 2 weeks with (hopefully) clear direction from > the folks behind the emailz. > > -chris > co-chair > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > sidr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
