I support the adoption of this draft, as it makes the operations of a CA less problematic.
I also 100% disagree with Randy’s view that it adds complexity. To the contrary, it lessens complexity, aids flexibility and decreases fragility. -andy On Apr 25, 2014, at 3:06 PM, Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com> wrote: > i really hate to side with dr kent :) > > i am unsure of this is a useful work item. please explain how it is > other than a complex (i.e. dangerous) patch to accommodate sloppy > operational praactices by a CA. > > make the protocol complex and you are vulnerable forever. sloppy CA > ops practices can always be remedied. so which is the worse problem? > > randy > > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > sidr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
