I have read the draft, and offered extensive comments and discussed the contents with the authors on this list.
I support adoption as a WG document, but would like to see more discussion to further clarify the proposal and its pros/cons. Sriram >-----Original Message----- >From: sidr [mailto:sidr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sandra Murphy >Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 12:05 PM >To: sidr@ietf.org >Cc: Sandra Murphy >Subject: [sidr] WG adoption poll for draft-huston-rpki-validation-01 > >The authors of draft-huston-rpki-validation-01.txt, RPKI Validation >Reconsidered, have requested wg adoption. > >See http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-huston-rpki-validation-01. > >Please do respond to the list as to whether you support the wg adopting this as >a work item. You do not need to comment on the content of this draft at this >time. You are asked to indicate if you think that this is work that the wg >should >be doing and whether this draft is an acceptable starting point. Adding >whether >you can/will review or not is useful. > >Note that active support is required for adoption. Silence is a vote against >adoption. > >This adoption call will end on 9 May 2014. > >--Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair >_______________________________________________ >sidr mailing list >sidr@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
