Super, Thanks. T.
On 5/01/2017, 2:06 PM, "iesg on behalf of Randy Bush" <iesg-boun...@ietf.org on
behalf of ra...@psg.com> wrote:
> "The considerations for RPKI objects (Certificates, Certificate
> Revocation Lists (CRLs), manifests, Ghostbusters Records [RFC6481]),
> Trust Anchor Locators (TALs) [RFC6490], cache behaviours of
> synchronisation and validation from the section on RPKI Distribution
> and Maintenance of [RFC7115] apply. Specific considerations relating
> to ROA objects do not apply to this document"
done. one can tell you hang out with lawyers who are paid by the word.
it says the exact same think with six times as many words.
> This is surely early days of BGPsec adoption and use. I have personal
> opinions about how adoption will go and what will be learnt or
> discovered along the way. So I do share Stephen's observation about
> painting one's self into a corner.
we all have our worries. but when a major rtgsec hits the wsj, at elast
we wil have a plan.
randy
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
