The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8182,
"The RPKI Repository Delta Protocol (RRDP)".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7239

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Job Snijders <j...@fastly.com>

Section: 3.2

Original Text
-------------
Certificate Authorities that use RRDP MUST include an instance of an
SIA AccessDescription extension in resource certificates they
produce, in addition to the ones defined in [RFC6487]:

Corrected Text
--------------
Certificate Authorities that use RRDP MUST include an instance of an
SIA AccessDescription extension in CA resource certificates they
produce, in addition to the ones defined in [RFC6487]:

Notes
-----
Between draft-ietf-sidr-delta-protocol-04 and draft-ietf-sidr-delta-protocol-05 
a bit of text was removed (perhaps because it was considered redundant). But, 
unfortunately that snippet helped establish important context as to what types 
of certificates are expected to contain the id-ad-rpkiNotify accessMethod 
inside the Subject Information Access extension. The text that was removed:

"""
Relying Parties that do not support this delta protocol MUST MUST NOT
reject a CA certificate merely because it has an SIA extension
containing this new kind of AccessDescription.
"""

>From the removed text is is clear that id-ad-rpkiNotify was only expected to 
>show up on CA certificates. However, without the above text, Section 3.2 of 
>RFC 8182 is somewhat ambiguous whether 'resource certificates' is inclusive of 
>EE certificates or not.

RFC 6487 Section 4.8.8.2 sets expectations that only id-ad-signedObject is 
expected to show up in the SIA of EE certificates "Other AccessMethods MUST NOT 
be used for an EE certificates's SIA."

The ambiguity in RFC8182 led to one RIR including id-ad-rpkiNotify in the SIA 
of the EE certificate of all signed objects they produce (such as ROAs). The 
RIR indicated they'll work to remove id-ad-rpkiNotify from all EE certificates 
their CA implementation produces.

It should be noted that the presence of id-ad-rpkiNotify in EE certificates is 
superfluous; Relying Parties can't use the rpkiNotify accessMethod in EE 
certificates for any purpose in the validation decision tree.

(Verifying this Errata does not block a future transition from rsync to https; 
as RFC6487 Section 4.8.8.2 leaves room for additional instances of 
id-ad-signedObject with non-rsync URIs)

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC8182 (draft-ietf-sidr-delta-protocol-08)
--------------------------------------
Title               : The RPKI Repository Delta Protocol (RRDP)
Publication Date    : July 2017
Author(s)           : T. Bruijnzeels, O. Muravskiy, B. Weber, R. Austein
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Secure Inter-Domain Routing
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to