Dear Raffaele,

your Ni atoms are too close to get reasonnable results.
The pseudopotential spheres (defined by the maximum core radius) should not overlap.
Your pseudopotential radius being 2.050 a.u. (1.1 Ang.), any calculation with atoms closer than 2.2 Ang gives dubious results.
A distance of 1 Ang is much too small. Siesta probably complained about the overlap in the output file.


The same thing applies for abinit.


Jean-Paul Crocombette


At 20:52 11/06/04 +0200, you wrote:

Dear all,
I have made a simple calculation of the forces between 2 Ni atoms at 1 Ang
distance
with siesta I obtain: -89, +89 eV/Ang
with abinit :-321,+321 eV/Ang

the pseudo potential that I used is obtained from atom with the following
input file:
  pg       Nickel
       tm2        0.00
n=Ni c=car
      0.0       0.0       0.0       0.0       0.0       0.0
   5    4
   4    0     2.000     0.000
   4    1     0.000     0.000
   3    2     8.000     0.000
   4    3     0.000     0.000
    2.050     2.050     2.050     2.050

the fdf file is:
SystemName          Ni
SystemLabel         Ni
NumberOfAtoms       2
NumberOfSpecies     1

%block ChemicalSpeciesLabel
1  28  Ni      # Species index, atomic number, species label
%endblock ChemicalSpeciesLabel

AtomicCoordinatesFormat  Ang
%block AtomicCoordinatesAndAtomicSpecies
0.000  0.000  0.000  1
1.000  0.000  0.000  1
%endblock AtomicCoordinatesAndAtomicSpecies

anyone knows the reason?

best regards,
Raffaele

_________________________________________________________________
Personalizza MSN Messenger con sfondi e fotografie!
http://www.ilovemessenger.msn.it/





SPAM: ------------------------ Spamnix Spam Report
-------------------------
SPAM: Spamnix identified this message as spam.  This report shows
which
SPAM: rules matched the message and how many points each rule
contributed.
SPAM:
SPAM: Content analysis details:   (102.9 hits, 5.0 required)
SPAM:  0.0
BAYES_50              
BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 50 to 56%
SPAM:                            
[score: 50.4%; H*c:flowed:0 H*c:format:0]
SPAM:                            
[anyone:99 knows:99 MSN:2 abinit:2]
SPAM:                            
[HTo:D*LISTSERV.UAM.ES:98 SIESTA-L:98 input:98]
SPAM:                            
[distance:98 HTo:D*ES:98 HTo:U*SIESTA-L:98]
SPAM:                            
[HTo:D*UAM.ES:98 atomic:3 HPrecedence:list:3]
SPAM:                            
[H*F:D*COM:96 H*R:U*SIESTA-L:96 H*R:D*es:96]
SPAM:                            
[H*R:D*uam.es:96 calculation:5 atoms:5]
SPAM:                            
[N:H*r:NN.NNN.NN:90 obtain:90 comparison:12]
SPAM:                            
[car:12 H*M:com:86 reason:85 H*r:pickup:15]
SPAM:                            
[H*r:service:15 H*r:hotmail.com:15]
SPAM:  100
FROM_REJECTED         
Sender is on Reject list
SPAM:                            
[EMAIL PROTECTED] matches [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SPAM:  2.9 FAKED_HOTMAIL_DAV     
X-Originating-Email header does not match From
SPAM:
SPAM: Spam level: **************************************************
SPAM: --------------------- End of Spamnix Spam Report
---------------------


Reply via email to