Sorry for my sluggishness - the picture above vise versa - it seems that
higher MD.MaxCGDispl gives higher forces, but maybe they will decrease
faster...
Also my MeshCutoff is already 800 because of Ce

Best wishes, Maxim.


2013/11/25 Максим Арсентьев <ars21031...@gmail.com>

>  Dear Frank!
>
> It seems for "normal_main" that you never reach 0.04 eV/Angstrom. How to
> fix that?
> And here is mt result (seems that MD.MaxCGDispl 0.15 Ang and DM.Tolerance
> 0.00001 behave better).
>
> Best wishes, Maxim.
>
>
> 2013/11/22 <fma...@icp.uni-stuttgart.de>
>
> A fluctuation in max. forces is normal. Attached is a max. force graph of
>> a few CG geometry optimizations I did of isolated molecules.
>>
>> Further details are in the following PDF: (keyword EggBox Effect)
>> http://www.home.uni-osnabrueck.de/apostnik/Lectures/SIESTA-tuto.pdf
>>
>> So the lower the max. force is, the less CG steps are required in my
>> experience and only then can you achieve low MD.MaxForceTol values.
>>
>> To reduce the max. forces you have to increase the finess of the real
>> space grid, by either increasing the MeshCutOff value or making use of
>> GridCellSampling:
>>
>> http://departments.icmab.es/leem/siesta/Documentation/Manuals/siesta-3.1-manual/node47.html
>>
>>
>> Best wishes,
>> Frank
>>
>>
>> > I'm doing geometry optimisation if I correctly set it (as I understand
>> > it's
>> > by default)
>> >
>> > Best Wishes, Maxim.
>> >
>> >
>> > 2013/11/22 Herbert Fruchtl <herbert.fruc...@st-andrews.ac.uk>
>> >
>> >> Just to clarify: You are doing MD, not a geometry optimisation, and you
>> >> are surprised that the forces don't go to zero? What are you trying to
>> >> find? For a minimum energy structure, you need a geometry optimisation.
>> >> In
>> >> an MD simulation the total (potential+kinetic) energy should remain
>> >> constant (depending on your ensemble...), but the forces will vary.
>> >>
>> >>   Herbert
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 22/11/2013 08:58, Максим Арсентьев wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>   Dear Sebastian!
>> >>>
>> >>> My calculations convverge at each MD cycle (about 300-400 SCF cycles),
>> >>> but max force oscillate (about 0.1-0.04 eV/anstrom) and I can not
>> >>> finish
>> >>> MD, and am already at 63 cycle and the calculation cycle is still
>> >>> going,
>> >>> although the system is quite large and contains 47 atoms. My counter
>> >>> question to all: does this oscillation of forces normal?
>> >>> I would like to strict DM.Tolerance to 0.00001 (it is VERY important
>> to
>> >>> accurate calculation of forces) and to limit MD.MaxCGDispl .
>> >>>
>> >>>   Best Wishes,
>> >>>   Maxim
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> 2013/11/21 Sebastian Caicedo Davila
>> >>> <sebastian.caic...@correounivalle.edu.co
>> >>> <mailto:sebastian.caic...@correounivalle.edu.co>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>     Hello Diana!!
>> >>>
>> >>>     Thanks a lot for your suggestion! I'll give it a try and maybe
>> I'll
>> >>>     be bothering you again, if it is not an imposition, of course.
>> >>>
>> >>>     Gracias de nuevo, y saludos desde tu tierra!
>> >>>
>> >>>     Sebastian Caicedo Davila
>> >>>     Bionanoelectronics Research Group
>> >>>     School of electrical and electronics engineering
>> >>>     Universidad del Valle
>> >>>     Cali - Colombia.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>     On Nov 21, 2013, at 11:02 AM, <d.otalv...@utwente.nl
>> >>>     <mailto:d.otalv...@utwente.nl>> <d.otalv...@utwente.nl
>> >>>     <mailto:d.otalv...@utwente.nl>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>      Hello Sebastian,
>> >>>>
>> >>>>     I have had similar problems with convergence of the scf cycle.
>> >>>>     They were solved when I changed from Pulay mixing to Broyden
>> >>>>     mixing for the charge density.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>     Usually if something doesn't converge in 250 cycles, it probably
>> >>>>     never will. Also you can play with the DM.Tolerance. For very
>> >>>>     difficult systems I set it to 0.0008 and then restart from that
>> DM
>> >>>>     file with a stringer convergence criterion.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>     Here is the settings I am using for my calculations:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>     #--------------------Convergence of
>> SCF---------------------------
>> >>>> ----
>> >>>>     MeshCutoff               200.0 Ry      # Default value PW cutoff
>> >>>>     for grid
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>     MaxSCFIterations        250              # Maximum number of SCF
>> >>>> iter
>> >>>>     DM.NumberBroyden        3
>> >>>>     DM.MixingWeight         0.01             # New DM amount for next
>> >>>>     SCF cycle
>> >>>>     DM.Tolerance            0.0001           # Tolerance in maximum
>> >>>>     difference
>> >>>>     DM.UseSaveDM            .false.          # to use continuation
>> >>>> files
>> >>>>
>> >>>>     DM.NumberKick                  100
>> >>>>     DM.KickMixingWeight            0.01
>> >>>>     #----------------------------------
>> >>>>
>> >>>>     Suerte!
>> >>>>
>> >>>>     PS: yo tambien soy caleña!
>> >>>>
>> >>>>     Diana M. Otálvaro
>> >>>>     PhD Candidate
>> >>>>
>> >>>>     Computational Material Science
>> >>>>     MESA+ Institute of Nanotechnology
>> >>>>     University of Twente.
>> >>>>     Enschede, Nederland
>> >>>>     ------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>> ------------
>> >>>>     *From:*siesta-l-requ...@uam.es <mailto:siesta-l-requ...@uam.es>
>> >>>>     [siesta-l-requ...@uam.es <mailto:siesta-l-requ...@uam.es>] on
>> >>>>
>> >>>>     behalf of Максим Арсентьев [ars21031...@gmail.com
>> >>>>     <mailto:ars21031...@gmail.com>]
>> >>>>     *Sent:*Wednesday, November 20, 2013 7:29 AM
>> >>>>     *To:*siesta-l@uam.es <mailto:siesta-l@uam.es>
>> >>>>     *Subject:*Re: [SIESTA-L] Convergence problem on heterostructure.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>     I forgot to tell you - besides DM.MixingWeight 0.05 I also set
>> >>>>     PAO.EnergyShift to 65 meV as
>> >>>>     herehttp://www.nature.com/nnano/journal/v7/n9/extref/
>> >>>> nnano.2012.127-s2.txt .
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>     Best wishes,
>> >>>>     Dr. Maxim Arsent'ev
>> >>>>     Laboratory of inorganic synthesis
>> >>>>     Institute of Silicate Chemistry of RAS
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>     2013/11/18 Mahmoud Hammouri<m...@nmsu.edu <mailto:m...@nmsu.edu>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>         You could also try to increase the non-equilibrium contour
>> >>>> points.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>         Mahmoud
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>         On Nov 18, 2013, at 11:22, "Sebastián Cauce do Dávila"
>> >>>>         <sebastian.caic...@correounivalle.edu.co
>> >>>>         <mailto:sebastian.caic...@correounivalle.edu.co>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>          Thank you very much for your suggestion. I will give it a
>> >>>> try!
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>         Sebastián Caicedo Dávila
>> >>>>>         Bionanoelectronics research group
>> >>>>>         School of electrical and electronics engineering
>> >>>>>         Universidad del Valle
>> >>>>>         Cali - Colombia
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>         On 18/11/2013, at 11:50, Максим Арсентьев
>> >>>>>         <ars21031...@gmail.com <mailto:ars21031...@gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>          I also try some siesta only six months, but for a more
>> >>>>>>         heterogeneous structure I noticed that the reduction
>> >>>>>>         DM.MixingWeight reduces oscillations in convergence, so try
>> >>>>>>         to play with it (decrease DM.MixingWeight). See
>> >>>>>>         http://www.nature.com/nnano/journal/v7/n9/extref/nnano.
>> >>>>>> 2012.127-s2.txt
>> >>>>>>         Maybe someone will tell something else.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>         2013/11/18 Sebastian Caicedo
>> >>>>>>         D.<sebastian.caic...@correounivalle.edu.co
>> >>>>>>         <mailto:sebastian.caic...@correounivalle.edu.co>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>             Dear Siesta/Transiesta users,
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>             I've been using the software for a couple months and
>> >>>>>>             made some calculations of InAs and InP unit cell quite
>> >>>>>>             successfully. Now I intend to work on transiesta
>> >>>>>>             calculations of a heterostructure of both these
>> >>>>>>             materials (InAs bulk with InP barriers). As a first
>> >>>>>>             approach I want to simulate a couple of InAs unit cells
>> >>>>>>             and the barriers shall be unit cells of InP, just to
>> get
>> >>>>>>             a qualitative idea. The electrodes .TSHS files were
>> >>>>>>             obtained from the previous calculations of the InAs
>> unit
>> >>>>>>             cell. I wanted first to run a siesta calculation of the
>> >>>>>>             whole heterostructure, so I can take a look at the
>> >>>>>>             eigenvalues and define a correct value for the
>> parameter
>> >>>>>>             TS.ComplexContour.Emin, as suggested in the manual.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>             The structure has 120 atoms and I'm using LDA
>> >>>>>>             Pseudopotentials, obtained from the siesta webpage. (In
>> >>>>>>             Pseudo includes semicore electrons, so we have enough
>> >>>>>>             electrons to build a zinc-blende structure). The issue
>> >>>>>>             is that after 1000 SCF steps, the energy doesn't
>> >>>>>>             converge at all. I'm doing a Gamma-point calculation,
>> >>>>>>             but even when I make the k-grid 1x1x15 it doesn't work
>> >>>>>>             either.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>             I used the same MeshCutoff as for the individual
>> >>>>>>             materials unit cell an 200Ry and I increased the Energy
>> >>>>>>             Shift, so the calculation would be a bit faster though
>> >>>>>>             less precise.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>             I attach the Input (INPUT.fdf, STRUCTURE.fdf) and
>> output
>> >>>>>>             files.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>             I would really appreciate any suggestions.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>             sincerely
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>             Sebastian Caicedo Davila
>> >>>>>>             Bionanoelectronics Group
>> >>>>>>             School of Electrical and Electronics Engineering
>> >>>>>>             Universidad del Valle
>> >>>>>>             Cali-Colombia
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>         --
>> >>>>>>         Best wishes,
>> >>>>>>         Dr. Maxim Arsent'ev
>> >>>>>>         Laboratory of inorganic synthesis
>> >>>>>>         Institute of Silicate Chemistry of RAS
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>     --
>> >>>>     Best wishes,
>> >>>>     Dr. Maxim Arsent'ev
>> >>>>     Laboratory of inorganic synthesis
>> >>>>     Institute of Silicate Chemistry of RAS
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Best wishes,
>> >>> Dr. Maxim Arsent'ev
>> >>> Laboratory of inorganic synthesis
>> >>> Institute of Silicate Chemistry of RAS
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Herbert Fruchtl
>> >> Senior Scientific Computing Officer
>> >> School of Chemistry, School of Mathematics and Statistics
>> >> University of St Andrews
>> >> --
>> >> The University of St Andrews is a charity registered in Scotland:
>> >> No SC013532
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best wishes,
>> > Dr. Maxim Arsent'ev
>> > Laboratory of inorganic synthesis
>> > Institute of Silicate Chemistry of RAS
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best wishes,
> Dr. Maxim Arsent'ev
> Laboratory of inorganic synthesis
> Institute of Silicate Chemistry of RAS
>



-- 
Best wishes,
Dr. Maxim Arsent'ev
Laboratory of inorganic synthesis
Institute of Silicate Chemistry of RAS

Responder a