Hi Paul,
Then it seems there is a misunderstanding, at least in the way I interpreted
what it was said in the meeting.
For me it is not just editorial changes, because there is not a link, in
between the PDP and the guidelines. It is not a matter of just "adding" that
link now. It is a matter of having either a guidelines developed following the
PDP (bottom-up) or updating the PDP itself (by means of the PDP as well), to
include the points that are needed from the guidelines.
My observation in the meeting was that the guidelines were developed too long
ago, by the SIG chairs, when we had many SIGs, not developed by the community,
and not developed on purpose for the policy development. I think there is a
substantial difference in between SIGs that don't develop policies and the one
responsible for the policies.
Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
El 26/2/20 6:18, "Paul Wilson" <pwil...@apnic.net> escribió:
Dear Jordi, and colleagues,
This policy document review is on the Secretariat workplan for 2020, and
it has been regarded as an editorial task, on an assumption that it will
not affect the substance of any policies.
Of course, any document changes would be subject to the usual editorial
review process, and progress will be shared with the community in time
for APNIC 50 where it can be discussed.
There is no plan to create a taskforce, but this could certainly be
decided at the next meeting, if the community agrees.
All the best
Paul.
________________________________________________________________________
Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC d...@apnic.net
http://www.apnic.net @apnicdg
On 25 Feb 2020, at 10:16, Srinivas Chendi wrote:
> Hi Jordi,
>
> Thanks for your suggestion. Secretariat will consult with the APNIC
> EC.
>
> Regards
> Sunny
>
> On 24/02/2020 8:53 pm, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
>> Hi Bertrand, all,
>>
>> As indicated in the meeting, the withdraw of this proposal is
>> "temporary", in view of the commitment from the EC/secretariat to
>> review the discrepancies in the actual PDP and SIG guidelines,
>> assuming that this will be brought back to the community, following
>> the bottom-up-approach, but the next meeting (maximum).
>>
>> I still thing that this should not be a task done only by the
>> EC/secretariat but instead a Taks Force should be setup. I hope the
>> EC can still consider setting up this TF.
>>
>> As a result of the EC review or TF review the community should be
>> able to decide how to move on, including, if needed, new policy
>> proposals.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jordi
>> @jordipalet
>>
>>
>>
>> El 24/2/20 3:57, "Bertrand Cherrier"
>> <sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net en nombre de
>> b.cherr...@micrologic.nc> escribió:
>>
>> Dear colleagues
>>
>> Version 2 of prop-134: PDP Update, did not reach consensus and
>> was
>> withdrawn by the author at the APNIC 49 Open Policy Meeting.
>>
>> Proposal details, including the full text of the proposal,
>> history, and
>> links to previous versions are available at:
>>
>> https://www.apnic.net/community/policy/proposals/prop-134/
>>
>> We'd like to thank the author and everyone for taking the time
>> to
>> discuss this proposal.
>>
>> Regards
>> Sumon, Bertrand, Ching-Heng
>> Policy SIG Chairs
>> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management
>> policy *
>> _______________________________________________
>> sig-policy mailing list
>> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
>> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> **********************************************
>> IPv4 is over
>> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
>> http://www.theipv6company.com
>> The IPv6 Company
>>
>> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged
>> or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive
>> use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty
>> authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents
>> of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is
>> strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you
>> are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if
>> partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be
>> considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original
>> sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
>>
>>
>>
>> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy
>> *
>> _______________________________________________
>> sig-policy mailing list
>> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
>> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>>
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy
> *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the
individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure,
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if
partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be
considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the
original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
