> Not true. You can modify the GPL to your heart's content.
Point taken. But if you change it then it really is not the GPL,
but something similar...
> No. You are the copyright holder. If you choose to distribute
> version 1.01 free, but make 1.02 a commercial program, that's up to
> you. The license restricts OTHER people. You, as the copyright
> holder, do not need a license.
I think this is correct, but to allay the concerns of the previous
poster, I will point out that even if 1.02 is released under a
non-free license, that new license cannot invalidate or change the
1.01 license. The prior license is still valid and cannot be
terminated. (if it could be, it would not be a free license)
Therefore, the 1.01 version will always remain free.
___________________________________________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] soli deo gloria
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Send administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
