How about taking the pissing match off line, OK?
Thanks!
Thomas Cameron, RHCE, CNE, MCP, MCT
Three-Sixteen Technical Services, Inc.
A subsidiary of TeamLinux Corporation
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of root
> Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2000 5:27 PM
> To: tom carlile
> Cc: SigLinux
> Subject: Re: Re: Re: Ruby, a better Perl?
>
>
> You asked if anyone knew about ruby, and asked if you would be wasting
> your time...all i was saying is since you already know perl, pick up the
> book advanced perl programming by oreilly and it has SEVERAL sections
> talking alll about the perl OO....so what i was simply saying is whatever
> it is you want to do is doable via perl and i suggest the easiest route
> would be stick with perl...and not waste time learning a whole nother
> language...i never said anything about your ability to program in
> perl..but you took it wayyyy wrong for some reason....all i'm trying to
> say is OOP is DEFINATLY doable via perl...thats all
>
> On Thu, 11 May 2000, tom carlile wrote:
>
> >
> > really? that's funny because i'd say the same about someone who wanted
> > to defend Perl's OOP. i am not offended, just unhappy that instead of
> > a discussion of Ruby, i got a squabble over Perl.
> >
> > On Thu, 11 May 2000, root wrote:
> > > Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 17:12:25 -0500 (CDT)
> > > To: tom carlile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > From: root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Reply-To: root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Subject: Re: Re: Ruby, a better Perl?
> > >
> > > damn don't get all offensive cheif...i was offering my two
> cents...and you
> > > are way off on that OOP statement....you obviously don't know
> perl that
> > > well...
> > >
> > > On Thu, 11 May 2000, tom carlile wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > i never said i didn't know perl. i would say i know perl pretty
> > > > well actually. no one who really wants OOP would use perl
> > > > for their project, period.
> > > > i didn't really ask for help with perl, ugh.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 11 May 2000, root wrote:
> > > > > Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 13:04:20 -0500 (CDT)
> > > > > To: tom carlile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > From: root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Reply-To: root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Subject: Re: Ruby, a better Perl?
> > > > >
> > > > > perl is a really good language...chances are you are
> > > > > going to have way more support/portability with it...and
> i bet perl is
> > > > > easier to teach yourself...and i suggest picking up
> advanced perl by
> > > > > oreilly, shows you the object oriented side of perl, it's
> really not that
> > > > > bad..
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 9 May 2000, tom carlile wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > i was wondering if anyone here has played with a
> scripting language
> > > > > > called Ruby. it apparently borrows a lot from Perl but
> did the OOP
> > > > > > part in a more sane way; they claim pure OOP like
> Smalltalk. anyway
> > > > > > it looks like Python and Perl rolled into one and is
> very popular in
> > > > > > Japan. has anyone played with it? i don't want to
> waste my time...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> > > > > Send administrative requests to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> > > Send administrative requests to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> Send administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Send administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
