Makes it complex - by investing are you investing in any returns for that
round, or for the lifetime of the programme?
J

On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Geoff McQueen - Hiive Systems <
geoff.mcqu...@hiivesystems.com> wrote:

>
> Phil,
>
> Quick question: since the idea is to have "rounds", would it really be a
> commitment to contribute $500 per half year for each of the 500 investors?
>
> If so, the share values themselves could probably be traded - if the group
> has a couple of decent exits to proper angel or series A or - God forbid -
> the businesses generate dividends without needing to have a specific
> liquidity event - which would result in the value of the shares going up.
>
> The trustholders/shareholders agreement or articles of association would
> require a capital raising every 6 months, which I don't see as an issue:
> however, if we don't have a liquid market to set the price for shares (which
> we shouldn't be aiming for: the idea of the network/connections/support
> stuff is that the investors would probably be pretty engaged and stable),
> when someone chooses to dip out or not pay up, how would you "buy out" their
> share? Surely it wouldn't be a sum of contributions, else people could vote
> with their feet if times were tough and realise a valuation greater than
> "book value"...
>
> These problems have solutions, and I've got a few ideas, but I was
> wondering if you had some comments to make about how this sort of thing
> would go over time since you've certainly already put a lot of thought into
> it...
>
> Geoff
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: silicon-beach-australia@googlegroups.com [mailto:
> silicon-beach-austra...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Phil Sim
> Sent: Friday, 6 February 2009 3:21 PM
> To: silicon-beach-australia@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [SiliconBeach] Re: question about startup funding in Australia
>
>
> I think anyone would agree that the benefit of being a part of a
> scheme like this, would be the advice and mentoring you would get from
> some of the 500 'shareholders'' who all have an interest in helping
> you to succeed. Suddenly, you've got a crowd of people who you can go
> for advice, guidance, etc. A swathe of people who have been following
> you from word go who might  then want to invest more as angels and a
> genuine path up to larger funding. Read the Y-combinator material and
> they go to great pains to say most of their companies dont need the
> money but they're doing it for the access to networks and guidance.
>
> After all, nobody REALLY needs money in Australia to do a start-up
> because you can go on the dole and just code until you've got
> something  to show for it, but its taking that next step to
> commercialise, market it, make those important first hires that people
> need help with.
>
> This is how I would see it working:
> 500 shares at $500 each gives an annual fund of $25k. Aim to fund 20
> startups in two batches six months apart. (2 x 10) Funding would be
> similiar to y-combinator model of $5k per founder. The event I
> previously proposed could be used in doing some of the selection
> process. The organisation would also try and get sponsorship
> agreements for free hosting, etc. further reduce costs. Again keeping
> to the Y-combinator model that would get the group up to 10 per cent.
>
> An email list like this would be used to keep the group up to date and
> for the startups to talk about their progress and ask for
> help/feedback. Nice and low maintenance. Virtual networking for the
> investors as well as the startups.
>
> The quality of the investors is important. I'd suggest an application
> process and that at least 100 powerful investors who are invited to
> join so as link the group to VC organisations, angel groups, political
> circles, and generally wealthy networks.
>
> After the first six months is up, startups that have done well could
> apply to receive one of the next batches as well.
>
> This is a concept I've been keen to get involved with for a long time.
> I even registered a domain virtualkapital.com a few years ago when I
> last got excited by the idea. Would be happy to donate that to the
> cause if people liked it.
>
> What this needs now is for some people to actually step forward and do
> something about it. If there is anyone that could do the
> legal/financial legwork to get up a structure that would work then I
> would be happy to use our upcoming media conference (feb 22 to 24) to
> launch this idea and get the publicity rolling and then to basically
> take the lead in marketing the organisation. Someone who would put
> some time into project managing it, would be useful as well...
>
> I sincerely think this would make a massive difference to our startup
> environment and provide a true path from seed through to VC funding.
>
> Phil Sim
> Chief Executive Officer,
> MediaConnect Australia Pty Ltd
> www.mediaconnect.com.au
> phi...@mediaconnect.com.au
> Ph: +61 2 9894 6277
> Fax: +61 2 8246 6383Mobile: 0413889940
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 10:30 AM, silky <michaelsli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Bart Jellema <bart.jell...@tjoos.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Have been following this thread for a while. Mick and David, some
> >> excellent input! Having been around the community for a while now I
> >> keep hearing this argument over an over that what Australia need is
> >> more access to funding. This is bugging me for a few reasons:
> >>
> >> - I feel that many use this as an excuse to justify their failure or
> >> much worse: Their failure to even try.
> >> - I get the feeling that some think "getting funding" = success,
> >> instead of the "creating a great product that solves someones issue" =
> >> success.
> >> - Sometimes I think people feel a sense of entitlement.
> >> - Many seem to me to have a skewed view of how hard/easy it is to get
> >> funding in the valley. (One of our friends in the valley spent
> >> countless coffees trying to get funding. After months they finally
> >> just bootstrapped it and sold to Salesforce after about 1.5 years.)
> >>
> >> Sure, some startups can only happen with funding, but in this day and
> >> age I don't quite understand why you would lose your focus and waste
> >> time on trying to get funding for a web startup if you can simply
> >> bootstrap it. Sure it takes sacrifice (Kim and I lived in my parents
> >> attic for 3 months to get tjoos off the ground) and it's a huge risk
> >> because in all likelihood you will fail. But how can you expect others
> >> to take that risk off you if you're not willing to take that risk
> >> yourself first? Once you get your venture off the ground and start to
> >> get some good traction you will find that there is plenty of money
> >> available in Australia to help you grow.
> >>
> >> Right now I meet many wantrepreneurs, hear about many great ideas, but
> >> see too little people cutting code and putting it on the road. I think
> >> it's true that one of Australia's problems is aversion to risk, but
> >> this doesn't only apply to the investment side. So I'd say: Take some
> >> risk, believe in what you do and just build it. If you're growing like
> >> crazy but can't grow as fast as you'd like because nobody wants to
> >> invest, then come bitching about it.
> >
> > Legitimate advice but nothing to do with the topic at hand - creating
> > a group to help fund people that *do* deserve it. Nobody wants to fund
> > people that don't.
> >
> > --
> > noon silky
> > http://www.boxofgoodfeelings.com/
> >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Silicon Beach 
Australia mailing list.

No lurkers! It is expected that you introduce yourself: 
http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia/browse_thread/thread/99938a0fbc691eeb

To post to this group, send email to
silicon-beach-australia@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
silicon-beach-australia+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia?hl=en?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to