On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Thaths <tha...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Udhay Shankar N <ud...@pobox.com> wrote: > > Thaths wrote, [on 5/31/2009 8:32 PM]: > >>> http://popwatch.ew.com/popwatch/2009/05/comic-book-shoc.html > >> As it says on the cover: Part 1 of 6. Pre-pubescent American girls > >> will never ever accept this sort of ending. I think this is a nice > >> manufactured controversy by the publishers to increase sales. > > Obviously. Like the death of Superman, and now Batman. And the deaths of > > various characters in various TV series, all of which were eventually > > revealed to be a dream, or mistaken identity, or... >
It's things like this which make me appreciate Bill Watterson even more than usual! ...and Hank Ketcham. Why do comics have to progress linearly in time? Why cannot Archie be forever 18? I never liked the Phantom going all gooey and marrying Diana and having twins..... Deepa.
