Since when is a troll entitled to an assumption of goodwill? Poisonous ideology is poison whether its for hot air trolling or for demolishing temples and burning trains
------Original Message------ From: ss Sender: [email protected] To: [email protected] ReplyTo: [email protected] Subject: Re: [silk] Assuming goodwill Sent: Aug 7, 2011 09:12 On Saturday 06 Aug 2011 10:24:13 am Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > Shiv, Anand, if you guys > You addresssing me? I seem to recall that you are able to "live with" not hearing my views. I think its rich that a thread gets started by someone and you make a post suggesting that I have something to do with it. To me this does not sound like goodwill to me - but I have something more to say about that. I would state that while this list has mostly been interesting to me, there is a deep reluctance on this list to discussion of some seriously contentious issues that are generally dismissed offhand as "right wing views". I do not recall reading anywhere in the guidelines that "right wing views" should not be voiced or that a person who accuses another of being 'right wing" or a sympathiser of "chaddiwalas" should be assumed to be doing that out of "goodwill". To that extent this thread is based on a laughably fatuous argument that restricts debate to the comfort zomne of some list members. shiv -- srs (blackberry)
