I agree with Biju's point. I would imagine that the reason for a list like this is that people with a reasonable level of intelligence can air their views. If we're looking for homogeneity in those views, that should have been made clear long ago. Since it wasn't part of the charter, too late.
If someone has a nice foaming fit on the list, what's not to like? We can (a) watch the fun (b) wind up people some more (c) dismiss them all as "chaddiwallas" (a term that's new to me, but obviously one with potential) (d) all of the above. As a well-known extreme rightist from Liverpool once wrote, "Nothing is real / And nothing to get hung about." (Are chaddiwallas compensating for not being well-hung? And are those of us who use that term automatically assumed to be going commando?) > In any case, what's interesting about always talking to people who agree > with you? I kinda miss Arsalan Zaidi, for those of you who remember. > > On the other hand, I rather object to hidden agendas, sock puppets and > similar weirdness. > -- J. Alfred Prufrock "Gliding wrapt in a brown mantle, hooded I do not know whether a man or a woman - But who is that on the other side of you?"
