On 14-Dec-11 1:04 AM, Kiran K Karthikeyan wrote: > Swinging opinions is a crime? > > > Not a crime, but against the professional code, especially when you > misrepresent and intentionally omit facts.
#facepalm I can see that my tone of disbelief didn't come through. In conjunction with words like 'misrepresent' and 'intentionally', when you talk about the need for a third party to a) determine; and b) enforce, a code, you are implying a burden of proof. Have you thought this fine scheme out that far? > > Professional ethics should be enforced somewhere, or we wait till a > > country of more than a billion wisen up and stop drinking the kool > aid. > > Enforced by? And they in turn? > > > I don't know Udhay. The buck has to stop somewhere. Or do you think > something else will work in a country where the information asymmetry > (heck, even access to information) is probably much greater than the > economic disparity? The problem I have with this is when you are attempting to use a pickaxe to perform surgery. > And thank you Salil for comparing it to Lokpal. Reductio ad Hazareum? There are more absurdities here, Horatio... Udhay -- ((Udhay Shankar N)) ((udhay @ pobox.com)) ((www.digeratus.com))
