>That has been my feeling for quite sometime Nancy. The SURFACE >area of smaller particles is quite astonishing. Maybe the math >pros around here could give us an laymans example of surface >area of particles that are 100ppm at .001 verses .005 for example. >I thought Reid was going to say something today about his Water-oz >silver. It appears that he is in the placebo study at the moment. >I think that is a good sign and a very valid observation on his >part. >bjs
Sorry I don't have access to the higher powered m-scope any more (had to give it back) so I can't see the partical size. I'm using a $30 tasko scope now. It does have one advantage over the other scope. It goes down to 60x and that alows me to see almost all of the microbes swimming around at one time. With the other I could only see a few at one time. By being able to see all of them you can tell if they are all effected or just one or two. Since Jim has a good M-scope one thing that could be done is filter testing. Meaning, if we know that XX partical size can't be seen by a microscope, then if he can see partical sizes above XX, we know that we need to filter. After filtering if we still see particals above the XX then we know we need a better filter. Take Care Reid -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the subject: line. To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@id.net>
