20081006-1011
THINK ABOUT IT !
 
    ALL THE FOLLOWING IS NOT NEW AT ALL,  BUT IT IS BEST TO KEEP REPEATING IT 
TO THE DEAF EARS AND BLIND EYES OF THE WORLD'S 6.7 BILLION FOOLS (ALSO CALLED 
"CITIZENS").
 
    PEOPLE IN RUSSIA HAVE A LOW (64 YEARS) LIFE EXPECTANCY BECAUSE THE 
GOVERNMENT WANTS IT THAT WAY .  FOR INSTANCE PEOPLE ARE BEING VACCINATED.   YET 
AS IS NOW WIDELY KNOWN  VACCINES DO NOT SAVE PEOPLE  BUT KILL THEM. THIS IS HOW 
VACCINES ARE USED BY ALL BIG GOVERNMENTS TO HELP THE DEPOPULATION PROCESS 
ORDERED BY THE INTERNATIONAL PLUTOCRACY.  SO WHAT DO PEOPLE DO?  NOTHING, THEY 
JUST GET SICK AN DIE (THE FOOLS ARE "PATRIOTS" READY TO SUFFER  AND DIE FOR  
THE GREATER WEALTH AND POWER OF THE WEALTHY  FEW).
 
JACQUES HARDY 
80 YEAR OLD SON OF PHARMACISTS,
WHO  REFUSED  ALL  VACCINATIONS
=========================================
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Lifeforce 
To: AB 
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2008 11:31 PM
Subject: Fw: The Terrible Consequences of Mass Innoculation with Polio Vaccines


Subject: The Terrible Consequences of Mass Innoculation with Polio Vaccines


 
Some of the consequences of injecting people with poisons known as vaccines. 
Also note the opening paragraph of the second article:
"Paralytic poliomyelitis, or polio, is a neurological disease caused by the 
enterovirus known as poliovirus. ... About 95 percent of infections are 
asymptomatic. Paralytic polio represents only 0.1% of all cases." 
As you can see, no vaccine is even needed. All you have to do is see to it that 
you are among the 95%. This can be accomplished with a plant based dietary 
regime that avoids refined sugar...which is the primary cause of polio to begin 
with. All vaccines are scams, and that includes the flu vaccine which they are 
ramping up their propaganda machines to promote.
http://christianparty.net/poliomassinnoculation.htm
Mass Innoculation of Polio Vaccines
 

What do the 19 countries Albania, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Cape Verde, Egypt, Iran, 
Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Mauritius, Papua New Guinea, the Phillipines, Sao Tome, St. 
Vincent, Tajikistan, Thailand, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan have in common?  
These are the countries which have been targeted by the World Health 
Organization for mass innoculation of the polio vaccine.  The rationale is that 
they are also the countries which have had the world's highest rates of polio, 
because they didn't participate in the earlier mass innoculations of these 
vaccines during the "polio epidemic" years of the 1950s.
But how widespread is polio in these countries, and what is the long term 
effect of the polio vaccines?  Their average rate of polio is 0.077 cases per 
100,000 population, which is not very many cases of polio.  It is less than a 
total of 250 cases--hardly sufficient justification for the mass innoculation 
of children with vaccines which have the potential to contain monkey viruses 
with unknown long term consequences.
Besides being the countries which were late in taking the polio vaccinations, 
all of these countries also have another thing in common--they have extremely 
low cancer mortality rates.  Men in Thailand have a cancer rate of 6.4 per 
100,000 population, which is one thirty fifth of the cancer rate for American 
men of 221.3.  The average rate of cancer for men in these 19 countries is 
43.9, and 37.3 for women, which is one fifth of the rate for Americans.  If the 
cancer mortality rate in the US had been equivalent to their average rate, 
there would have been 107,907 cancer deaths in the US in 1996 rather than 
539,533--431,626 fewer deaths.
They also have an average cancer rate equivalent to the 15 South American 
countries which didn't take the polio vaccine until recently, well after the 
"polio epidemic" of the 1950s: Belize, Brazil, Costa Rica, Mexico, Suriname, 
Venezuela, Panama, Paraguay, Nicaragua, Peru, El Salvador, the Dominican 
Republic, Colombia, Honduras, and Guayana.  Men in these countries have an 
average cancer rate of 39.3 and women 43.8, which is much lower than EVERY 
country which took the polio vaccines in the 1950s.  The cancer rate for men in 
the US (221.3), 97% of whom were innoculated with the Salk Vaccine, many as 
early as the 1950s, is 5.6 times higher, and the cancer rate for men in Russia 
(227.3) who took the Sabin Vaccine is 5.8 times higher.  The cancer rate for 
men in Hungary (351.5) who took the Sabin Vaccine is almost 9 times higher.
These examples disprove the assumption that living longer increases the number 
of cancer deaths.  The life expectancy for Russian men is only 64 years, and 
for Hungarian men is only 68 years, which is equivalent to the life expectancy 
of men in Honduras and Peru and shorter than that for men in Mexico.  Men in 
Peru, Paraguay, and Guayana live 8 years longer than Russian men but their 
cancer mortality rate is one sixth of Russian men.  Men in Belize have a life 
expectancy rate equivalent to Hungarian men, but their cancer mortality rate is 
one twelfth as high   http://fathersmanifesto.com/lifeexpectancy.htm 
If 100% innoculation of the human population eliminates polio, or decreases the 
polio rate from 0.077 cases per 100,000 population to zero, but if the long 
term effect is a five fold increase in the cancer mortality rate from 40 to 200 
deaths per 100,000 population, then we have an act which can't be described by 
any other term than world wide totalitarianism.   Of every 100,000 people of 
the world, 160 additional cancer deaths is 2,078 times as great as the absolute 
best reduction which can possibly be achieved by this world wide polio 
innoculation program.   In other words, for each 1 case of polio that this 
vaccine prevents this year, it causes 2,078 additional cancer deaths thirty 
years from now.
Do doctors know this?  Did they know in 1955 that the Salk Vaccine would cause 
an EXTRA 431,626 cancer deaths today?  If each cancer death results in a 
quarter of a million dollars worth of income for the medical profession, then 
cancer is a $108 billion cottage industry for doctors.  Is this why doctors 
around the world are still pushing the mass innoculation of the polio vaccines 
long after all of the terrible consequences are proven and well documented?
 

 
Cancer Rate in Non-innoculated Countries
 
 Men
 Women
 Polio Rate
 
Albania
 69.3
 34.7
 0
 
Azerbaijan
 82.3
 55.2
 0.06
 
Bahrain
 35.3
 32.3
 0.00
 
Cape Verde
 45.2
 50.3
 0.00
 
Egypt
 23.6
 17.3
 0.11
 
Iran
 53.2
 42.4
 0.16
 
Kuwait
 21.9
 24.1
 0.00
 
Kyrgyzstan
 88.5
 64.9
 0.00
 
Mauritius
 42.6
 47.3
 0.00
 
Papua New Guinea
 5.3
 3.3
 0.05
 
Phillipines
 33.9
 29.2
 0.01
 
Sao Tome
 42.8
 46
 0.00
 
St. Vincent
 62
 76.8
 0.00
 
Sri Lanka
 29.3
 26.1
 0.00
 
Syria
 7.1
 5
 0.00
 
Tajikistan
 57.3
 43
 0.42
 
Thailand
 6.4
 5.5
 0.00
 
Turkmenistan
 69.8
 56.2
 0.15
 
Uzbekistan
 58.7
 49.3
 0.51
 
average
 43.9
 37.3
 0.08
 


 
Cancer Rate South American Countires Which Were Innoculated Late
 Men Women 
Belize
 29.6
 29.1
 
Brazil
 76.8
 60.8
 
Costa Rica
 81.7
 63.6
 
Mexico
 46.1
 51.2
 
Suriname
 48.5
 55.9
 
Venezuela
 55.9
 60.2
 
Panama
 37.9
 41.4
 
Paraguay
 4.59
 50.9
 
Nicaragua
 9.4
 16.1
 
Peru
 27.9
 32.7
 
El Salvador
 32.7
 44.3
 
Dominican Rep.
 28.2
 28.2
 
Colombia
 61.3
 64.1
 
Honduras
 11.3
 16.1
 
Guayana
 37.8
 42.9
 
average
 39.3
 43.8
 

 
 
Cancer Rates in Early Innoculation Countries
 Men
 Women
 
US
 221.3
 186
 
Canada
 220.4
 174.7
 
Austria
 260.5
 240.5
 
Belgium
 320
 222.4
 
Croatia
 270.2
 182.3
 
Denmark
 308.5
 276.6
 
France
 304.8
 184.6
 
Russia
 227.3
 161.5
 
 http://www-dep.iarc.fr/dataava/globocan/who.htm   World cancer rates 
 http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr47_9.pdf    US Cancer rate 
 http://www.polioeradication.org/pdfs/wer7117.pdf   world polio rates 
 http://www.who.int/wer/pdf/1999/wer7438.pdf   world polio innoculation rates 
 http://www.who.int/wer/pdf/1999/wer7412.pdf   Asian polio innoculation rates 
 http://www.polioeradication.org/pdfs/wer7144.pdf   Middle East polio 
innoculation rates 

 
 
Modified Monday, September 22, 2008
Copyright @ 2007 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party
http://minority-health.healthlink.mcw.edu/article/943032112.html
 

New Recommendations for Polio Vaccine 
Paralytic poliomyelitis, or polio, is a neurological disease caused by the 
enterovirus known as poliovirus. It is transmitted through stool with an 
incubation period of 5-35 days, averaging 7-14 days, and is more common in the 
summer and fall in temperate climates. About 95 percent of infections are 
asymptomatic. Paralytic polio represents only 0.1% of all cases. 
Paralytic polio affects the nuclei of cranial nerves (bulbar polio) and the 
anterior motor neurons of the spinal cord (spinal polio). 
Bulbar polio results in double vision, facial weakness, difficulty talking, 
nasal voice, weakness of the neck muscles, difficulty in chewing and 
swallowing, and even regurgitation of fluids through the nose. There may be 
loss of the gag reflex necessary to protect the airway, pooling of secretions, 
tongue deviation, and associated respiratory paralysis. 
Spinal polio usually results in an asymmetric paralysis of the arm and leg 
muscles, and may involve muscles of the bladder and respiratory system. 
Diagnosis is usually confirmed by viral culture of stool specimens and throat 
swabs. 
Some of the complications include pneumonia, urinary tract infections, 
emotional problems, persistent paralysis, shock, the post-polio syndrome 
(characterized by muscle pain, exacerbation of weakness and/or new paralysis) 
and even death. 
In order to prevent polio, two types of vaccines were developed -- a live oral 
vaccine (OPV) developed by Dr. Sabin and an inactivated injectable vaccine 
(IPV) developed by Dr. Salk. The current oral vaccine is a live, attenuated, 
trivalent virus vaccine that offers the benefits of easy administration, local 
gastrointestinal immunity and secondary spread, or herd immunity, through 
shedding into the intestinal tract. However, it also carries the risk of 
vaccine associated paralytic polio (VAPP), which occurs in one case per 2.4 
million doses given. This risk is highest after the first dose - approximately 
one case per 760,000 doses given. 
Since 1979 there have been no cases of indigenous wild-type polio in the United 
States, but there have been 144 cases of polio associated with OPV use. The 
likelihood of someone bringing the wild-type poliovirus back into the United 
States has substantially decreased due to the global polio eradication 
initiative. 
In 1997, in order to decrease the risk of VAPP but continue the benefits of 
OPV, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended giving 
the inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) for the first two immunizations followed by 
OPV for the third dose and subsequent booster prior to starting school. The 
only disadvantage to IPV is that it involves a shot, however, no declines in 
childhood vaccination coverage have been observed despite the need for 
additional injections. 
In order to eliminate the risk for VAPP, the ACIP is now recommending an 
all-IPV regimen for routine childhood vaccination in the United States. All 
children should receive a total of four doses of IPV at ages 2 months, 4 
months, 6-18 months, and 4-6 years. 
OPV should only be used in unvaccinated children who will be traveling in less 
than 4 weeks to areas where polio is endemic; in mass vaccination campaigns to 
control outbreaks of paralytic polio; and in children of parents who do not 
accept the recommended number of vaccine injections. In this latter group, OPV 
should be used only for the third and fourth doses and only after the risk for 
VAPP is discussed with the parent or caregiver. 
Karin Mutersbaugh, MD
Staff Physician
General Internal Medicine and Pediatrics
Plank Road Primary Care Clinic
Article Created: 1999-11-19
Article Updated: 2001-07-24

Each year, Medical College of Wisconsin physicians care for more than 180,000 
patients, representing nearly 500,000 patient visits. Medical College 
physicians practice at Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Froedtert Memorial 
Lutheran Hospital, the Milwaukee VA Medical Center, and many other hospitals 
and clinics in Milwaukee and southeastern Wisconsin. 
 
 
 
 


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>