You wrote: "In addition to the above I know of 4 more people who started chemo and quit after the first round, and when asked why they quit said something to the effect of “I would rather die than go through any more of that”. "
What is the status of these 4 people compared to the 14 people doing chemo? Or are they included in that number? Dan On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Paul Bond <pmb...@gmail.com> wrote: > I just did a quick count of all the people I know who have had chemo (14 > people), and know of only 1 that survived more than 5 years. He was an > exceptional case though (18 years old with the starting problem in his knee, > major surgery, radiotherapy and follow up in his lungs after they cut > everything up). People with radiotherapy that I know or have known seem to > do better, but suspect that’s more because of the site being more localised > which allowed that treatment. In addition to the above I know of 4 more > people who started chemo and quit after the first round, and when asked why > they quit said something to the effect of “I would rather die than go > through any more of that”. Of course there are different chemo treatments > and it would be wrong for me to generalise on that. The last fatality was > my mother late last year. She had Taxol along with a couple of rounds of a > platinum based therapy I can’t recall the name of. I went back to England > in a bid to get her onto something a bit less painful and damaging to her > immune system (I believe that health, at least from a physical aspect, is > immunocentric). She refused, as her doctor was giving her enough things > already, so it was my unfortunate role to have to stand down and respect her > wishes. I just *know* that together we could have given her much better > odds than the doctor. That’s what has me still studying all this stuff and > take an active role. If people want to take the conventional route then > that’s their sovereign right, but if they want an alternative then I’m going > to be there for them. > > > > All that brings up a question that perhaps someone could offer advice on. > If I say to someone in casual conversation that there are sometimes ways > that have far greater possibilities than those offered by BigPharma, the > response is “If that were true then everyone would be doing it and you’d be > a millionaire”. How can you explain in a nutshell without boring someone > why the profit motive overrides the cure? > > > > Paul B > > > > From: silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com > [mailto:silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com] > Sent: 16 September 2009 03:32 > To: silver-dig...@eskimo.com > Subject: silver-digest Digest V2009 #546 > > > > Why do these people (Health Ranger) emphatically claim that NO ONE has ever > been cured of cancer by chemotherapy? My father in law had chemo for > non-Hodgkins lymphoma at 85 and an interferon therapy a couple years later, > then had heart bypass at 89 and was fine till 94. I know several women > who've had breast cancer and after surgery and chemo have survived without > cancer symtoms for all these years. That is just why alternative medicine > proponants lose credibility, they make sweeping dismisals of all mainstream > medical treatments. They are so hostile to physicians that they don't even > realize that THE DOCTOR WANTS TO SUCCEED BY MAKING THE PATIENT WELL. > Course, I'm thinking I might try home treatment if it ever happens to > > __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature > database 4427 (20090915) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. > > http://www.eset.com > -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down... List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
