No..actually it was a conclusion jumped to without considering threshold
level factors and the broader picture of sources.
The vaccine may have crossed an existing threshold for you, but by your
own testimony, wasn't the major source of mercury.
The chelation and amalgam removal may have brought you just below MS effect
threshold.
You see... 10 Tuna fish sandwiches may have done the same thing as the
vaccine.
But you did get the vaccine and didn't eat the sandwiches...so how do you
know?
You don't know.
I've been using CS for ten years and haven't gotten sick, therefore "CS
prevents illness".
However, HAVING used the CS, you DON'T know what would have happened had
you not...and you just can't do both at once to find out.
So, at best, we can draw a general conclusion about ideas.
It's a good idea to use CS....even if it doesn't work, it does no harm and
it just might work, but there's no way to know on a personal basis and
illness is nothing BUT personal.
It's a good idea to avoid ALL sources of mercury as best you can.
Ode
This is it in a nutshell, and although I believe your warning Steve is a
very valid one, in my case it was not an assumption that it was the
vaccines, but the mercury in the vaccine!
Hanneke
At 12:53 AM 1/01/2010, you wrote:
People are always looking for cause and effect. There is a danger of
being too eager to use anecdotal evidence to assign something as a cause
when there are so many other things that may be to blame The problem
with this kind of thing is that nobody knows if there is a correlation or
not since this is 'merely' anecdotal evidence.
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...
List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
