The question is. Is any tomato more nutritious than no tomato?
100 years ago, you couldn't buy ANY tomato unless it was in season
locally...then, was it grown in a burned out field or a carefully tended
garden, in either case, sprayed or not sprayed with Arsenic?
Plus
Organic of yesteryear by default is not the same as a organic of today by
design.
Ode
At 11:47 AM 4/19/2010 -0500, you wrote:
I guess to backup a step, what exactly does this stmt mean? Is a
store-bought, non-organic tomato "more nutritious" than a store-bought
tomato from 100 years ago? I could hardly believe that.
Alan
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 8:24 AM, Alan Jones
<<mailto:alanmjo...@gmail.com>alanmjo...@gmail.com> wrote:
Ode, can you support this statement?
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 5:43 AM, Ode Coyote
<<mailto:odecoy...@windstream.net>odecoy...@windstream.net> wrote:
Nutrition today is vastly better than it was 100 years ago.
--
Alan Jones
--
Alan Jones
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org
Unsubscribe:
<mailto:silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/silver-list@eskimo.com/maillist.html
Off-Topic discussions: <mailto:silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com>
List Owner: Mike Devour <mailto:mdev...@eskimo.com>
