Key word "therapy" indicating that somebody has some idea of what they
are dealing with.
Ozone will eat the tires right off your car..is why drill cords fall apart
after a few years
See also: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trioxidane>trioxidane
Ozone, along with reactive forms of oxygen such as
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superoxide>superoxide,
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singlet_oxygen>singlet oxygen,
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_peroxide>hydrogen peroxide, and
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypochlorite>hypochlorite ions, is naturally
produced by <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_blood_cell>white blood
cells and other biological systems (such as the roots of
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tagetes>marigolds) as a means of destroying
foreign bodies. Ozone reacts directly with organic double bonds. Also, when
ozone breaks down to dioxygen it gives rise to oxygen
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_radical>free radicals, which are highly
reactive and capable of damaging many
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic_compound>organic molecules. Ozone has
been found to convert <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cholesterol>cholesterol
in the <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood>blood stream to plaque (which
causes hardening and narrowing of arteries). Moreover, it is believed that
the powerful oxidizing properties of ozone may be a contributing factor of
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inflammation>inflammation. The
cause-and-effect relationship of how the ozone is created in the body and
what it does is still under consideration and still subject to various
interpretations, since other body chemical processes can trigger some of
the same reactions. A team headed by Dr.
<http://www.iupac.org/organ/members/w/wentworth.html>Paul Wentworth Jr. of
the Department of Chemistry at the
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scripps_Research_Institute>Scripps Research
Institute has shown evidence linking the antibody-catalyzed water-oxidation
pathway of the human <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immune_system>immune
response to the production of ozone. In this system, ozone is produced by
antibody-catalyzed production of
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trioxidane>trioxidane from water and
neutrophil-produced singlet
oxygen.<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone#cite_note-33>[34]
When inhaled, ozone reacts with compounds lining the lungs to form
specific, cholesterol-derived metabolites that are thought to facilitate
the build-up and pathogenesis of
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atherosclerotic_plaques>atherosclerotic
plaques (a form of <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heart_disease>heart
disease). These metabolites have been confirmed as naturally occurring in
human atherosclerotic arteries and are categorized into a class of
secosterols termed atheronals, generated by
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozonolysis>ozonolysis of cholesterol's double
bond to form a 5,6
secosterol<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone#cite_note-34>[35] as well as
a secondary condensation product via
aldolization.<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone#cite_note-35>[36]
Ode
At 11:06 AM 11/23/2010 -0800, you wrote:
I know someone who just got IV MMS (not activated). He felt really run
down for a few days aftwerword. I wonder if MMS is really safe. Humble
says it does not affect healthy tissues, and says it is a weak
oxidizer. I wonder if someone knows about calculating "oxidation
potential" or whatever it is called, and comparing it to other
substances? Ozone therapy appears to be harmless for example, but it
probably has very few actual number of free radicals compared to taking MMS.
~Davud
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:59 AM, bob Larson
<<mailto:bobl...@cablespeed.com>bobl...@cablespeed.com> wrote:
here's the highlights of my personal experience as well as observations of
others (on MMS & CS lists over time) with both.
if CS works for you, forget MMS.
MMS is harsh on the body... it is a powerful oxidizer and while it kills
pathogens it also depletes antioxidants, so heavy antioxidant
supplementation is needed after not long.
MMS reacts with whatever it contacts that is susceptible to oxidation,
including body tissues.
MMS is used up rapidly reacting with stuff, and mostly doesn't make it into
hard to reach places where pathogens may be, like inside host cells (virus)
and is mostly only good at getting to stuff in the blood.
MMS over time is hard on the immune system because of depletion of
antioxidants.
CS, by unknown means seems to enhance the immune system and silver does get
into all the cells of the body with long term use. when it gets inside
cells it doesn't leave readily, so while it may take the form of silver
compounds, those compounds may still be direct pathogen killers.
CS appears to have the ability to cause apoptosis of cancer cells. MMS may
destroy cancer cells by oxidation, showing initial benefit but as the MMS
runs down the immune system the cancer may get the upper hand.
MMS may be better for many problems where a short term burst of high kill
power is needed against stuff in the blood, and might be good to use in
"pulses" with CS used when the MMS is not.
MMS is vile to the taste... CS is not.
more, but i have no time to go on and am not an expert.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Beth [mailto:csilverl...@yahoo.ca]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 6:32 AM
> To: silver-list
> Subject: CS>cs vs mms?
>
> Hi
> Okay so I have been studying results from CS and MMS.
> Can someone tell me what the difference is?
> Is there a different result if I use silver compared to using mms?
> Or do they both do the same thing?
> If you have an opinion whether scientific or not, I would
> like to hear it.
>
> Beth
>
>
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Rules and Instructions:
<http://www.silverlist.org>http://www.silverlist.org
Unsubscribe:
<mailto:silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Archives:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/silver-list@eskimo.com/maillist.html>http://www.mail-archive.com/silver-list@eskimo.com/maillist.html
Off-Topic discussions: <mailto:silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com>
List Owner: Mike Devour <mailto:mdev...@eskimo.com>