"Real" studies are getting such a bad reputation now that "really real"
ones don't get much more credibility with some of us.
"Real really real" studies, where you try it out yourself, are far more
believable. One or two miracles soon convince, but consistent results,
that's on-going credibility material.
Being through nasty shingles near the eye in a week tends to convince.
(Rhus Tox initially, self administered, followed by Herpes Zoster from
practitioner at earliest possible appointment).
Seeing the disappearance of nasty bugs in double quick time also tends
to convince.
It's so sad that any test/study of homeopathic remedies by orthodox
personnel makes a test invalid already to some of us.
One has grown to expect dirty tricks and manipulation, sabotage,
whatever. Never mind, even if they manage to make homeopathy
unavailable, some of us won't want their orthodox pharmaceutical
products. Sad, because even if they work (which they should, because
some of them at least are tested for frequency compatibility by the kind
of programs that produce tailor-made homeopathic remedies) some of us
won't believe the results haven't been stroked, manipulated, strangled
and shredded because of the actions of a percentage of "study" organisers.
There's a fuss going on in Australia at the moment about bogus or
incorrect 'study' results.
http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/content/2013/s3823977.htm
SOPHIE SCOTT, REPORTER: In May this year, details of a ground-breaking
new skin cancer treatment were revealed.
The discovery of the so-called super drug was led by renowned biologist
Professor Levon Khachigian.
LEVON KHACHIGIAN, SCIENTIST, UNSW: It sends the tumour into a death
spiral and as a consequence the body's own defence systems clean up the
tumour.
SOPHIE SCOTT: The drug is a DNA enzyme called DZ13. It targets cancer
cells by switching off a master gene, slowing down the growth of
tumours. The potential of the drug was hailed by experts in the field.
The study has been halted, but the person who raised the alarm didn't
have her contract renewed.
R
On 13/08/2013 12:13 PM, Steve G wrote:
I don't think that any study conducted by a homoeopathist would be
very credible considering that these are people who believe that
homeopathy is a real medical treatment.
Are there any real studies that lead us to such findings?
