Isolating the virus was accomplished a year ago, it's not that complicated.
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 5:27 PM Max <mperrau...@cox.net> wrote: > Im well aware of the PCR scandal and the claims there is no isolation per > Koch postulates. I have watched so many videos of the different claims, > like everyone else. > > If the argument that there is no sars cov 2 virus is true and that it is > only the flu, then there is no reason to search for laboratory gain of > function. Nobel winner Luc Montangier's concern that HIV may have been > inserted would be dismissed. > > > Moreover, there are clinical pictures that are unique. High altitude like > hypoxia, long covid. Long covid may be similar to vaccine injury. If we > say there is no virus, then there is no reason to treat long covid or > injury due to covid spike protein > > > isolating the virus appears to be a complex issue. You cant isolate it > per Kotch postulates because it requires a living being to complete a life > cycle, its not an independent living organism. > > > Qualified people like Yeadon and Robert Malone, who are against the > mainstream covid narrative, believe there is a sars cov 2 virus. The > disease etiology may involve more than one virus or microbe. But the > sequencing of genomes probably has validity, as far as it goes. > > > Dr Martin lays out an argument that Pfizer and other companies made > patents on gene sequences related to sars cov 2. This would be strong > evidence in court to indite big pharma criminals over pre planned > profiteering from a pandemic and vaccine. But when we say there is no > such a thing as sars cov 2, Dr Martins work is immediately moot and > invalid. > > > I think you people are barking up the wrong tree. > > > Max > > > > On 8/26/2021 11:58 AM, Elizabeth Williams wrote: > > exactly > ------------------------------ > *From:* Diane Mackey <diane.mac...@gmail.com> <diane.mac...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Thursday, August 26, 2021 1:57 PM > *To:* silver-list@eskimo.com <silver-list@eskimo.com> > <silver-list@eskimo.com> > *Subject:* Re: CS>natural immunity superior to vaccine > > There is no test for variants, any more than there was a reliable test for > CV-19! > > On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 2:30 PM Elizabeth Williams <belzi...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > > The fda has stated that the pcr test is faulty so all of this was built on > a faulty test, they never actually isolated c-19 and they have no test that > tells them of a difference of varients. This whole pile was built on faulty > test, statistics and most importantly bucket loads of fake fear. it is the > flu. > Elizabeth > ------------------------------ > *From:* siriusley13 <highergroun...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Thursday, August 26, 2021 1:18 PM > *To:* silver-list@eskimo.com <silver-list@eskimo.com> > *Subject:* Re: CS>natural immunity superior to vaccine > > I have to ask again about any stats and numbers at all, based on what test > and what exactly was found? If we forget that bottom line we enter the maze > of lies upon lies > On Aug 26, 2021, 11:32 AM -0600, Max <mperrau...@cox.net>, wrote: > > > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon> Virus-free. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
