w8w8 wrote: > I suggest you read your bible without a preconceived outcome.
That is what has to be done. > Since > Genesis (and the rest of the bible) have hundreds (yes, hundreds) of > absurdities and inconsistencies it is difficult to know what the bible > really says. For instance: > > There was light ("night and day") (Genesis 1:3) before there was a sun. > (Genesis 1:16) (Note: If there were no sun, there would be no night or > day. Also, light from the newly created heavenly bodies seems to have > reached the earth instantaneously though it now takes thousands or > millions of years.) > You are misinterpreting. Lets see what science says. First there was a big bang. Initially there was nothing but atomic particles and light. Then those condenced into matter, that eventually became the sun stars and planets. For a great deal of infomation on how matter is condenced light see http://ascension2000.com That is exactly what the Bible says. As far as the word day, you need to review the original texts Genesis came from. The texts say period of time, not day. So once again science and these ancient texts agree, although the translator mistranslated the indeterminate period to day. > > Every plant and tree which yield seed are given to us by God as good to > eat.(Genesis 1:29) (Note: This would include poisonous plants such as > hemlock, buckeye pod, nightshade, oleander.) > I don't find this anywhere. What translation and what verse? > > Genesis 3:14-16 God curses the serpent, Eve, and Adam for what they have > done. (Note: This is inconsistent with God's omniscience; God should > have known full well, ahead of time, what the outcome would be. Since > God created the three as well as the Tree of Knowledge, he is ultimately > responsible for the Fall.) > OK, the translators once again are confused. They translate 3 different words into the one word "God", The Creator, the masters and the planets. If you check the original texts, this was the masters. Also where the sons of the Gods found the daughters of man beautiful and mated with them, they are talking about the masters as well. Genesis is about 1/100 the length of the original text it came from. The creater created the space time continium, stars plants and so forth. The masters created man in their own image, using dna from themselves and apes. Man was a slave to the masters, and they were not suppose to reproduce. One of the masters was a DNA specialist, a doctor, who's sign was DNA, which was seen as snakes, thus he had the nickname of serpent. He gave the humans the forbidden fruit, that is capability of reproducing, and the other masters were really pissed about it. As far as God the creator, all this was within the rights of free will and was of no real consequence from a spiritual development viewpoint. It is all experience for the Creator, and thus is good. > > If you want to explore these absurdities and inconsistencies further, I > suggest it NOT be done under the guise of being silver related. I agree, that is why I am emailing you off the list. Grab the 12th planet. Stitchen is an excellent researcher who has researched the original Sumerian documents and shows that science and the history recorded in the documents are 100% in accordance with each other. But of course one would expect it since the information was provided originally by the masters who knew where they came from as well as where we came from. Marshall -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>