In some of the early mass inoculations, nations which did not vaccinate had rates of the disease an order of magnitude lower than those who did use the stuff.
To see the writings of a Dr. unafraid to speak, search "Dr. Richard Moskowitz". James Osbourne Holmes a...@trail.com FTNWO -----Original Message----- From: John Rigby [SMTP:ri...@fablor.com] Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 9:17 PM To: silver-list@eskimo.com Subject: Re: CS>Immunization OT Ha there Roger & folks, Subject: Re: CS>Immunization OT > For what it is worth: > As a statistician I can say that there is absolutely no empirical evidence > for the efficacy of vaccination at all, rather evidence to its exceptional > dangers. > > John > > John: I was intrigued by your last statement. In light of the virtual > elimination of a number of infectious diseases during the last century, I > would like to know how you arrived at this conclusion. Roger WOW! Far too big a topic for an easy answer and certainly too big and far off-topic for the list. Just look in the Cyberbog under anti-vaccination and information that was totally hidden as short a time ago as 5 years is all out there *with* names, dates and places to satisfy any REAL scientist. ( A person trying to objectively ascertain truth by test) ANY statistician/epedemiologist worth his salt can show that there is statistically insignificant support for the theory of Vaccination. But would be professionally insane to do so - or exceptionally brave - and there are heroes out there! Actually, on the last major eval that an interest group that I am in, ran on this very matter ( as a test for a different process), running water availability has the highest correlation of all. HOWEVER the fundamental failure of the concept is simple: WHY does the percentage of the population affected remain constant? WHY is it that only 30% of the grouped population contracts the disease? WHY don't the vaccinations work comparatively? Odd point: Even in nature it was rare, until recently, for her to eliminate more than the magic 30%. Although it might be unfair to "blame" Mother Nature anymore..... We seem to have taken over and far more effectively. BTW: We haven't eliminated any major killers in the last century at all. Many of these scourges have (apparently) a 150 year cycle - the actual lifespan probable for a healthy human........... from a biologists point of view. ????????? Nightmares potential: Haven't you noticed how they are "all coming back"? For anyone interested in such "occult" matters - I can point you to some odd things - but always with the disclaimer: I'm just the messenger - don't blame/shoot me! Cheers, John -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
