Good point. Not as far as I know Roger. This CS (grainy Tyndall) is likely to be unstable.
Ivan. ----- Original Message ----- From: <rogalt...@aol.com> To: <silver-list@eskimo.com> Sent: Saturday, 24 March 2001 21:50 Subject: Re: CS>Tyndall yet clear > In a message dated 3/24/01 3:38:27 AM EST, i...@win.co.nz writes: > > << Subj: Re: CS>Tyndall yet clear > Date: 3/24/01 3:38:27 AM EST > From: i...@win.co.nz (Ivan Anderson) > Reply-to: silver-list@eskimo.com > To: silver-list@eskimo.com > > I suggest you look very closely at the Tyndall beam, Pete, particularly > at the consistency of it. The beam should be a solid homogenous band, > and should not appear grainy at all. If it does appear grainy then the > particles are very large and reflect or diffract white light but the > solution still looks clear. I have experienced this in an experimental > batch, and was quite surprised. > > Other than this I can offer no explanation. > > Ivan. > >> > > Ivan: Yes, but, has anyone correlated your Tyndall characterization, or > particle size distribution, for that matter, to in vivo CS effectiveness? > Roger --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.237 / Virus Database: 115 - Release Date: 08/03/2001 -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
