Thanks for posting this. Fascinating and interesting. Will you be doing further testing? Also, how did you know the smokers lungs were "clean?" Because of the reaction? Have always been leary of H202 in vaporizers, etc., Thanks. suzy
> Greetings, all: > > The combination of hydrogen peroxide and colloidal silver is fascinating. > According to a few ambigious sources I've run across, hydrogen peroxide > stabilizes ionic silver, and it certainly appears that Ivan's earlier > comments are right on... It certainly appears that hydrogen peroxide > ionizes small silver particles. About a week ago, I took about a 10ppm > colloidal silver solution as my based, and created a 3% H2O2 solution. Two > weeks later, the solution is still very active ( if I leave the container > sealed for a few days and then open it, built up pressure is released along > with a vaporous white cloud ). > > It's taken quite awhile to build up the courage to start experimenting with > H2O2 in the lungs. However, after finding several references ( equally > ambigious ) about the safety of such a practice, I decided to personally > investigate. > > I approached the subject with due caution. > > To create my base 3% H2O2 colloidal silver solution, I added about 40.6 CCs > (ml) to ~ 14.6 ounces of colloidal silver ( both together exactly filled a > 16 ounce amber glass container ). For this type of conversion, I used a > javascript program I wrote @ > http://silverdata.20m.com/conversion%20form.html > > Then, I added 3 drops of this 3% solution to 8 ounces of distilled water to > achieve a 0.0025% H2O2 solution. I used a second program I wrote for the > calcuation @ http://silverdata.20m.com/conversionform2.html > > I figured such a dilution would be a safe starting to point to start to > examine any effects of this combination. > > I've initially discovered some interesting things that are worth a moments > thought for anyone who might be considering experimentation. > > With healthy relatively healthy lungs, I have not been able to discover any > negative effects ( with my very limited experience to date ). The H2O2 > certainly stimulates the cleaning of lung tissues; of that there is no > doubt! In the .0025% dilution, there is no direct irritation to the lungs > that manifests any symptoms such as burning sensations, ect... Quite a > pleasant experience, in fact. > > However, with lungs that are NOT so healthy, the story changes. It seems > that it is very wise to pause and consider what the lungs have been subject > to before approaching H2O2 inhalation therapy. > > After having determined that the H2O2 CS solution appeared to be safe, the > treatment via ultrasonic humidifier was attempted with a smoker. The effect > was a dangerous and mixed blessing. > > Only three breaths of the mist was used. Initial report of "feeling > strange" occured within 30 seconds. At one minute, the individual's heart > rate began to increase. It continued to climb over the next two minutes to > the point where the individual's hands started shaking uncontrollably, > vision began to blur, and the initial tingling-numbness began to set in. > Luckily, at about 4.5 minutes the heart rate stabilized and then slowly > dropped down to normal. The individual was left feeling perfectly fine, > with clearer lungs. > > It took me awhile to determine exactly what happened. The action of the > hydrogen peroxide apparently, while clearing the lungs, released large > amounts of accumulated nicotine directly into the blood stream, resulting in > a nicotine overdose, which can easily be deadly. > > It is a safe assumption that a similiar effect could occur with anything > that has accumulated in the lungs, including perhaps perscription inhalation > drugs and other toxic substances. > > I'm certainly very grateful today that it is my practice to err on the side > of caution! > > In the future, with the help of my enthusiastic experimentee, I might try to > find a dilute enough combination that acts as a cleansing agent without > poisoning the body. Theoretically, one could slowly clean out the lungs, > and increase the amount of H2O2 used ( not in the case of a smoker though! ) > thereby eliminating the risk of introducing "large" amounts of toxic > substances directly into the bloodstream. > > It is interesting to note, however, that such a small amount of H2O2 > 0.0025% ) can have such an action on the body. > > Comments and/or suggestions/thoughts are certainly welcome! > > >
