To all interested listmembers:
I have followed the recxent postings relative to
incorporating H202 into the pulmonary system protocol involving
nebulization. After inquiring from some of our staff involved in some of
our evaluations several years ago.....I am informed that CAUTION is the
watchword when dealing with unknown pathogenic parameters. I am informed
that pronounced adverse reactions occurred in some of our animal
evaluations. The problem was determined to be based upon
the nature/condition of the biological terrain of the lungs----AT THE TIME
OF INHALATION. It seems that, although, the
air sacs are superficially exposed to atmospheric 02 on every inhalation
(excepting those compromised by anerobic pathogens insulated from this high
O2 gas (air) .....there exists a circumstance presenting serious challenges
to the UNREGULATED exposure to H202. The systemic challenge can manifest if
sufficient volume of the H202 mist comes into sudden...direct contact with
ANY sizeable anerobic population If there is a sizeable population of
anerobes present----WHICH PRESENT IMMEDIATE ACCESSIBLITY to the incoming
H202 mist......the possibility exists that the foaming action could be great
enough to generate SERIOUS consequences. This possibility rises by an order
of magnitude if DMSO is involved in the protocol. Our staff confirmed this
through animal experiments. Adverse reactions were encountered in some
cases involving H202 concentrations as low as 2%. The stabilizing protocol
involved 100% 02 at 1.25 atmospheres----and was instituted at the FIRST
signs of pulmonary distress.
In my opinion, administering CS in combination
with H202----into an unknown pathogenic environment involving the
lungs----could be VERY serious. I am not attempting to be alarmist in this
instance; just pointing out what should be obvious to all
deliberate/cautious researchers. The odds against a serious adverse
occurrence are, probably, higher than its likelihood......but even long odds
are not too desireable when the breathing system is involved.
If one insists on experimenting with such a
protocol, it would appear prudent to start at or below .5% H202 . It
would, also, be adviseable to mix a sample of the volunteer's sputum with a
generous amount of your protocol solution and observe for reaction.....prior
to inducing inhalation procedures.
Sincerely,
Brooks Bradley.
"M. G. Devour" wrote:
> A.V.R.A. wrote:
> > It is interesting to note, however, that such a small amount of H2O2
> > 0.0025% ) can have such an action on the body.
> >
> > Comments and/or suggestions/thoughts are certainly welcome!
>
> I'm not suggesting that the H2O2 is *not* responsible for the extreme
> reaction your test subject had, but a useful control would be to give
> him/her another treatment with *no* H2O2 in it, just the water or CS or
> whatever.
>
> I wonder if just introducing the extra fluid into the lungs could have
> caused the reaction. The trouble will be managing the subject's
> expectations. Do you tell them what you're doing or not? <grin>
>
> Very interesting report!
>
> Mike D.
>
> [Mike Devour, Citizen, Patriot, Libertarian]
> [mdev...@eskimo.com ]
> [Speaking only for myself... ]
>
> --
> The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
>
> To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to:
> silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com
> with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line.
>
> To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
> Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
> List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
