Thank you for the informative post Brooks... My primary idea in incorporating H2O2 through inhalation is to increase the colloidal silver efficacy. Although I'm greatly interested in oxygen therapies, various reports suggest that overall, IV treatments are both safer and more effective.
I'm sure there must be a safe dose level, the idea is to discover it, then slowly increase the dosage level over time. I approach oral use of H2O2 in the same manner. As far as I'm concerned, if one experiences discomfort, then one really needs to cut the dosage down to a level where no noticeable side effects occur ( provided one is in a non-life threatening position ). Currently, I often add 1 drop of 3% H2O2/CS to about 10 ounces of drinking water, which comes out to about a 0.0007% H2O2 solution. After a few minutes, I can feel that a reaction is occuring in my mouth, but the action of the H2O2 in the stomach is not great enough to cause any discomfort. I'm still trying to figure out exactly why my head gains greater clarity when I do this - how exactly greater levels of oxygen are reaching the blood stream through this oral ingestion. I can only report mild improvements in digestion and greater clarity of mind. A subtle yet prolonged and long term effect on the immune system is what I am reaching for with treatment. When beginning to consider using the H2O2 solution via inhalation therapy, my primary concern was exactly what was mentioned - I had this nightmere vision of the H2O2 coming in contact with pathogens, and the explosive action actually destroying lung tissue, and some poor soul suffocating. That is why I started with such a diluted solution, even though I had already collected numerous reports of safe use of much higher concentrations. The good news is, if such a small concentration of the H2O2/CS had such a dramatic effect ( somewhere around .0025% ) then it is feasible to achieve good long term results from an even FURTHER diluted substance without compromising safety in the least. The thing I don't like about H2O2 is the tissue damage it causes when used on "diseased" tissues. I can achieve FAR better results using other methods. However, at the same time, I have this feeling that H2O2 combined with colloidal silver is something that really deserves a great deal of exploration. The problem I've been running into is tissue irritation. The obvious solution is to dilute the H2O2 even further. I have been operating off of the apparently false assumption that for skin use, a 3% solution needs to be used. I think I need to "re-think" this idea. If one is using colloidal silver, the destruction of pathogens is most likely of secondary concern. Ideally, one I would think needs JUST enough H2O2 to oxidize dead tissues to allow the colloidal silver to better reach the underlying tissue to stimulate rapid healing. Perhaps time will tell! ----- Original Message ----- From: BROOKS BRADLEY <liat...@flash.net> To: <silver-list@eskimo.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 8:34 PM Subject: Re: CS>Caution using H2O2/CS Inhalation Therapy > To all interested listmembers: > I have followed the recxent postings relative to > incorporating H202 into the pulmonary system protocol involving > nebulization. After inquiring from some of our staff involved in some of > our evaluations several years ago.....I am informed that CAUTION is the > watchword when dealing with unknown pathogenic parameters. I am informed > that pronounced adverse reactions occurred in some of our animal > evaluations. The problem was determined to be based upon > the nature/condition of the biological terrain of the lungs----AT THE TIME > OF INHALATION. It seems that, although, the > air sacs are superficially exposed to atmospheric 02 on every inhalation > (excepting those compromised by anerobic pathogens insulated from this high > O2 gas (air) .....there exists a circumstance presenting serious challenges > to the UNREGULATED exposure to H202. The systemic challenge can manifest if > sufficient volume of the H202 mist comes into sudden...direct contact with > ANY sizeable anerobic population If there is a sizeable population of > anerobes present----WHICH PRESENT IMMEDIATE ACCESSIBLITY to the incoming > H202 mist......the possibility exists that the foaming action could be great > enough to generate SERIOUS consequences. This possibility rises by an order > of magnitude if DMSO is involved in the protocol. Our staff confirmed this > through animal experiments. Adverse reactions were encountered in some > cases involving H202 concentrations as low as 2%. The stabilizing protocol > involved 100% 02 at 1.25 atmospheres----and was instituted at the FIRST > signs of pulmonary distress. > In my opinion, administering CS in combination > with H202----into an unknown pathogenic environment involving the > lungs----could be VERY serious. I am not attempting to be alarmist in this > instance; just pointing out what should be obvious to all > deliberate/cautious researchers. The odds against a serious adverse > occurrence are, probably, higher than its likelihood......but even long odds > are not too desireable when the breathing system is involved. > If one insists on experimenting with such a > protocol, it would appear prudent to start at or below .5% H202 . It > would, also, be adviseable to mix a sample of the volunteer's sputum with a > generous amount of your protocol solution and observe for reaction.....prior > to inducing inhalation procedures. > Sincerely, > Brooks Bradley. > "M. G. Devour" wrote: > > > A.V.R.A. wrote: > > > It is interesting to note, however, that such a small amount of H2O2 > > > 0.0025% ) can have such an action on the body. > > > > > > Comments and/or suggestions/thoughts are certainly welcome! > > > > I'm not suggesting that the H2O2 is *not* responsible for the extreme > > reaction your test subject had, but a useful control would be to give > > him/her another treatment with *no* H2O2 in it, just the water or CS or > > whatever. > > > > I wonder if just introducing the extra fluid into the lungs could have > > caused the reaction. The trouble will be managing the subject's > > expectations. Do you tell them what you're doing or not? <grin> > > > > Very interesting report! > > > > Mike D. > > > > [Mike Devour, Citizen, Patriot, Libertarian] > > [mdev...@eskimo.com ] > > [Speaking only for myself... ] > > > > -- > > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > > > > To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: > > silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com > > with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. > > > > To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com > > Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com> > >
