In a message dated 5/22/01 3:42:28 AM EST, gaia.resea...@pixie.co.za writes:
<< In the interests of advancing our understanding of colloidal silver, let us please stop being petty and over-sensitive, but please let us also be open to criticism and free to express ourselves. My earlier allegedly offensive remarks were reasonably, albeit briefly motivated. My challenge to Frank to explain his offensive remarks remains open, in spite of other's attempts to police freedom of expression. If this list will not allow open debate, I am challenging Frank go to my website debating forum "THE FREE RADICAL: The Editor Speaks Out .... and Visitors Back-Chat" and explain himself there without fear of censorship at http://pluto.beseen.com/boardroom/k/53454/ If Frank does take up the challenge, would he please be so kind to inform the list. If he does not do so, I will allow his declining to do so to speak for itself. Regards Stuart >> Stuart: Personalizing a scientific debate is not helpful since it tempts each side away from a logical exchange of IDEAS to ego driven "one upsmanship". Scientific debate takes a great deal of self restraint which, for the vast majority of us, is in very short supply. Roger -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
