Marshall Dudley, James Osbourne-Holmes wrote:

"Because it is not so. See "General College Chemistry" 6th edition, page 96 and 
97:
Absorption spectrum: When continuous electromagintic radiation, for example, 
white light, passes thorugh as substance, certain wavelengths of radiation may 
be absorbed.  The wavelength are characteristic of the substance that absorbs 
the radiation, and the pattern of these dark lines is referred ot as the 
absorption spectrum.  When cool a substance absorbs radiation at the same 
wavelengths that it emits when excited. Marshall
"James Osbourne, Holmes" wrote: "As for so-called "Far infrared fibres" - the 
concept defies basic
 thermodynamics. All materials emit and absorb precisely the same spectrum of 
heat radiation when at the same temperature."
 If this is so, why do infrared thermometers have an "emissivity" adjustment 
that varies with the material being scanned? A black body has maximum 
emissivity.Other materials vary depending on their composition and surface 
texture."

Solar Wrote:

"Kevin, The ability of a material to absorb energy at one wavelength and emit 
it at another is very easy to demonstrate. It is done on a daily basis. 
Something as simple as a flourescent light works like this. The ultraviolet 
light emitted by the excited gas is converted to white light by the phospher 
coating. One can also use a nitrogen laser emitting UV to excite various dyes, 
which then emit energy at another wavelength. Believe it or not, human bone 
behaves in this manner. When excited by
ultraviolet light, it emits IR radiation. This is covered in the book "The Body 
Electric", by Dr. Becker. Because I am rearrnaging my entire house right now, I 
can't cite the pages, or the studies, at this time. As long as the energy 
conversion doesn't exceed 100%, I can't see where it violates the laws of 
thermodynamics. I do understand your statements, though, concerning two bodies, 
at the same temperature, without additional energy being added. In that case, 
yes, they will emit energy at the same wavelength.-- Best regards, Solar"

Folks - apples are being compared to oranges. I was at pains to point out that 
we are talking about a product "FIR fibre", that supposedly bathes the object 
in oodles of far infrared when applied at room or body temperature (or in the 
case of meat wrapped in a FIR bag, in the fridge). Under these circumstances, 
the fibres are at or very close to the temperature of the surrounding 
environment. They are not being bathed in sunlight, UV, lasers, or the like. I 
repeat - any material in thermal equilibrium with it's environment emits and 
absorbs precisely the same spectrum as the environment - there is no possible 
enhancement of far infrared waves. See for example "Thermal Physics - 2nd Ed'n, 
Charles Kittel/Herbert Kroemer, pp96-97: Emission and Absorption: Kirchoff 
law". We notice objects around us having different colours and shades precisely 
because the light by which we are able to see is very far from being in thermal 
equilibrium with our room temp environment - the effective temperature of 
sunlight is around 6000 degrees centigrade. Emissivity and absorptivity is then 
very important - black underwear dries on the clothes-line much faster than 
white underwear, etc. The point here is that a knowledge of basic physics can 
save one being conned. As stated before, the FIR material worn as underwear, 
socks, etc, can only "work" if it happens to have better insulating properties 
than brand X - but that is a separate issue to what we are discussing here.

regards, Kevin Nolan [email protected]