Dear Group: Would someone please translate Brooks Bradley's fascinating post about Kelp. I am over 60, so I think this may be applicable.
I am guessing that 11 oz of kelp powder is "11 oz. dry weight" mixed into 1 gallon of water? (It does not like to mix! How do you suggest?) Does this need to be refrigerated after mixing? Then I would like to make 32 oz batches. If 2 table spoons for 1 gallon, then it would be 1/2 table spoon for 32 oz of water? Now if I wanted to add 20% CS. That would be 6 oz CS and 26 oz of water and 1/2 table spoon of concentrated solution? Is that right so far? Now when he talks about Celtic sea salt I get lost. Can this be translated into how many teaspoons per 32 oz? All you chemists are probably laughing, but ....... Juergen P. (Jim) Meissner Check out my Website at www.MeissnerResearch.com Read about the benefits of the Brain State Synchronizer sounds for improving your life and health. ----- Original Message ----- From: BROOKS BRADLEY <liat...@flash.net> To: <silver-list@eskimo.com> Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 2:30 PM Subject: CS>POSSIBLY USEFUL PROTOCOL INVOLVING KELP EXTRACTS > The recent animal-related posts jogged my failing memory > into recalling some interesting....and I believe, useful investigations > we conducted some time in the past. These endeavors revolved about the > possible efficacy of "kelp-based solutions" for nutritional support and > disease prevention/abatement in animal pets and livestock. Our results > were VERY encouraging. > The most efficacious protocol was as follows: > Starting with a concentrated solution of kelp (seaweed) > extract [ approx. 11 ounces of soluble powder in 1 gallon of water], we > used 2 tablespoons CONCENTRATE diluted in 1 gallon of water......as the > basic mixture. Our goal was to evaluate the benefits---if any---of > using this material as a nutritional support and/or a disease prevention > modality for domestic pets and livestock. The beneficial results > exceeded our expectations. In chickens furnished this solution free > choice, NO significant nutritional-based deficiencies were > detectable(less than .1%)......with them receiving 3 different > commercial feed mixtures. Among controls, a background pathogenic level > of 5% was a constant....and in some cases outbreaks of varying pathogens > expressed as high as 20%...on occasion. Among "purposely infected" > groups, naturally -occurring recovery/resistance spontaneously > established (lowering mortality from 60% to 10%) when the kelp solutions > were administered as the sole source of liquid intake AFTER THE > INFECTION. The speed and completeness of recovery was noticeably > enhanced when the parent solution was diluted 20%, by volume, with 10 > ppm CS. This in spite of contentions/suspicions of antagonisms between > the silver colloid and the parent solution substances. Among subjects > furnished access to the Kelp X CS combination solution, we were able to > infect...via direct injection....less than 2% of the subjects----and the > resulting insults were, in almost all cases, quite mild. Mortality was > less than .05%. > Our results among dogs, cats, and birds.....were equally > impressive; although the physical number of subjects was much smaller. > We did encounter some difficulty in getting cats to drink water > containing this level of kelp.....at least in the beginning. The only > successful method involved maintaining them in cages.....during the > evaluations. > At the time of these experiments we did not utilize MSM, > vitamin supports, fluid electrolyte enhancement, etc. > A rather fascinating byline relating to this type > investigation is that a similar modality involving human volunteers > (older subjects....beyond 60) yielded superior results----when employing > a somewhat modified version----for individuals suffering from a variety > of chronic expressions. The principal modification involved a second > dilution of the kelp X CS with 25%, by volume, of complete sea-solid > solution (reduced from 35,000 ppm to 8750 ppm). The sea solid solution > may be constructed using any acceptable FULL SPECTRUM source (e.g. > Celtic Sea Salt, etc.....but never ANY white or leached marine salt). > This latter modification enabled a rather pronounced synergistic > effect. Interestingly, we utilized the same unmodified, agricultural > grade, kelp powder..... which we used in the animal experiments. Our > bacteriological tests (of these CS containing solutions) revealed no > viable pathogens extant.....prior to use for the human volunteers. > While there was little difference in the kelp > products we evaluted, we settled.....for the bulk of our tests.....upon > on one called Maxicrop. The reasons being that it gave the best > solubility results and seemed to evoke more pronounced biological > benefits----probably as a result of superior extraction/concentration > techniques. We do not endorse this----OR ANY OTHER---product. These > were, simply, our particular results under our particular criteria. > I hope some among you find this of interest. > Sincerely, Brooks Bradley. > -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
