Many thanks, Brooks. The trouble with describing an arrangement in terms of some particular commercial product (in this case, Radio Shack magnets) is that one is obliged to go out and buy that particular product. A little difficult if there are no Radio Shack stores around (like here in Australia). By simply stating "arrange the magnets to produce a field perpendicular to and crossing the pipe/funnel axis", as you have in effect now done, eliminates that problem and allows one to use any old brand X magnets. Sorry if this seems picky - you are performing an excellent service for us all.
regards, kevin Nolan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brooks Bradley" <liat...@flash.net> To: <silver-list@eskimo.com> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 6:11 PM Subject: Re: CS>Question for BB re: Blood Levels in Canine Enema/CS/DMSO Protocol > Hello Kevin, > My apologies for not being more specific in my general > comments. > The easiest way to establish the orientation of these > magnets is to just place them together in "any" arrangement that facilitates > their attaching to each other. They will, automatically, indicate when any > attractive configuration occurs. The + and - poles will be self-identifying > when you move the magnets coincident to a configuration where the magnets try to > pull together. These magnets are normally polarized ( N X S poles) on the wide > sides ( 1" X 1.25" surface), so this should be quite simple to accomplish. It > makes no difference which magnet is furnishing the + or which magnet is > furnishing the - pole.....in the arrangement----for our purposes.. Neither does > it matter which end of the magnet is facing up or down, along the vertical axis > of the funnel proper; as the magnetizing force establishing polarity is > occurring through the short (3/8" thickness) dimension.. > When you lay one magnet (long axis parallel to the side of the > tubing or funnel throat) against the tube surface....the magnetic field will be > perpendicular, as the field will be established across the tubing, to the > corresponding magnet on the other side. It would be as if you took a lead > pencil and placed it (evenly arranged) between two magnets with the largest flat > dimension of each magnet facing the other (being sure to have them placed in an > "attractive" configuration)----it is not necessary to determine which magnet is > furnishing the + and which is furnishing the - pole. One word of caution: If > you are using a small funnel, be sure to block on each side with square wooden > separators before taping.....otherwise there is a strong prospect the magnets > may move together on one side or the other.....over time or from a physical > disturbance. Actually, it is a good idea to do this, no matter what the size of > the funnel tubing. > The most effective reaction for the water treatment resulted > from a relation wherein the magnets were placed at the junction of the funnel > cone and the funnel's exit tube----with the magnets extending (long axis up) > from this juncture back up (in the vertical) toward the top of the funnel. A > useful, but less effective result came from attaching the magnets (long axis > parallel to funnel tube) along the exit tube section of the funnel. > I will send you a post later on our evaluations of Schauberger's > hypotheses. > I must go for now. > Sincerely, Brooks Bradley. > > Kevin Nolan wrote: > > > Hello Brooks. I am afraid to say thay your description re magnet geometry is > > quite ambiguous as it stands. How am I supposed to figure what the > > magnetization direction is in a Radio Shack rectangular bar magnet - any > > orientation is possible?! Could you please indicate whether the intended > > magnetic field direction is primarily at right angles or parallel to the > > pipe axis. Have you tried both possible orientations? I would also be very > > interested to hear what you found on Schauberger-style vortexing; just what > > produced what result. > > > > regards, Kevin Nolan > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Brooks Bradley" <liat...@flash.net> > > To: <silver-list@eskimo.com> > > Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2002 5:30 AM > > Subject: Re: CS>Question for BB re: Blood Levels in Canine Enema/CS/DMSO > > Protocol > > > > > Dear James, > > > Please excuse my tardy response....the speed > > of life > > > seems to be exceeding my capabilities. Yes, there are several different > > magnets > > > which will furnish useful results. The most economical and > > efficient---for cost > > > and availability---may be obtained from Radio Shack. They are the small > > > rectangular (ceramic type) ones; about 3/8" thick X 1" wide X 1.25" > > long. I > > > forget what we paid for them....but it was quite reasonable; probably > > about .25 > > > each. The orientation should be in the long dimension parallel to the > > tubing > > > geometry. It is of no consequence which magnetic pole is in what circular > > > position......just be sure that one (+) pole is facing one (-) > > pole----forming > > > the magnetic influence. Actually, our best results came from the use of > > > neodymium magnets salvaged from computer hard drives.....but (sometimes) > > the > > > alignment presents a challenge (unless you obtain units where the > > orientation is > > > on the flat sides). > > > The neodymium magnets seemed to be the only > > ones > > > capable of producing any measureable improvement in the utilization of > > > combustible hydrocarbons (i.e., gasoline). These hydrocarbon evaluations > > were > > > quite non-scientific....being performed by shop personnel during "free > > time"............................. > > > > > > Best Regards, Brooks. > > > p.s. Interesting you should memtion Viktor Schauberger, we have > > investigated a > > > number of his postulates......and have been able to verify them ALL. His > > > seminal works on vortices remains as the "high-water" mark in such > > > investigations. > > > > -- > > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > > > > To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: > > silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com > > with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. > > > > To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com > > Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com> >
