Dear Jonathan,
You said:
<<This criticism below strikes me as familiarly dismissive and
condescending and quite uncalled for. The article is not speculative;
it is an extremely well-researched, fascinating hypothesis well based on
experimental evidence. >>
You said it above in your own words. You said it is a hypothesis. A
hypothesis
is a speculation until it is proven. Then it becomes a theory.
I'm sorry you took it as condescending. As far as dismissive, I'm an
Aries, and now I'm an Aries with a very limited amount of energy. I
conserve it where I can.
This may make me sound blunt or dismissive to some.
I'd like to se the actual studies. Articles may be well-written, but they
seldom give all the details one needs to properly evaluate what is being put
forth.
Regards,
Catherine
--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
