url: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/m61936.html Re: CS>A Cheap, High-Compliance Constant Current Source From: Dan Nave Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 06:53:29
Hi Dan, > Mike, > Your constant current source looks very interesting. > A few questions... What sort of voltage supply did you envision > that would be giving 150 to 160 volts to use with this circuit? > Rectified and filtered AC line voltage (120V, nominal) would work > out to approximately 170 VDC. Would this be suitable? Sure, but be very careful connecting to the AC line. You can use a polarized plug with a wide blade, or a regular 3-wire plug with a ground. But watch out for reversed connections on the socket. I find them all the time. Your calculation is correct. It should give 170VAC, but there are so many tv's, pc's and other devices on the line that tend to flatten the peak. If you look at it on a scope, you can definitely see the peak has a ramp shape as the filter caps get charged. I also like to add a 10 ohm surge limiter in series with the diode. This reduces the voltage after the rectifier, so I only get about 164VDC. Another alternative is to use two voltage doublers on a 24VAC bell transformer. This will give about 130VDC. Here's a schematic: http://www3.sympatico.ca/add.automation/misc/130vdc.htm If you want to use this, increase the caps to about 10uF per mA that you expect to operate. This will give about 1.5V p-p ripple with a half-wave rectifier at 60Hz. I deliberately set the cap values low in the schematic to minimize the short-circuit current in the event of a fault. In any case, be very careful with voltages and currents that can kill. Never trust circuits that run at these levels. Make sure inquisitive kids can't get to it while you are out. Arrange the power switch so it discharges the caps when power is turned off, like this: http://www.geocities.com/mrmonett/shingles/120vac.gif > Also, what did you mean by R5=2 X 47K ohms? Perhaps you stated the > wattage of the various resistors but I didn't see it. I suppose we > could calculate it... Yes, I forgot to describe that. The TL413 requires a minimum of 1 mA so I set the current to 1.5mA. With 150V source, this takes 100k, and the power dissipation is 225mW. A common 1/4W resistor could be used, but I don't like running components at their rating, so I used two 47k in series to get about 100k. > What is your electrode size and spacing and how long does it take > you to reach current limit in your setup? Each electrode is 48 inches of 12 ga wound in a flat spiral to fit horizontally inside a Pyrex 2 litre measuring cup. The top electrode is at the 48oz mark, and the bottom electrode is at the 16oz mark. They are about 1.5 inches apart. The cover is a plastic child's starter plate from WallMart with a slot cut in one edge for the handle. I used 6-32 screws to keep the lid aligned and center the electrodes in the Pyrex. It's kind of springy. When I walk in the room and sit at the computer, I can see the 4th digit on the cell voltage bounce around due to small waves disturbing the Nernst diffusion layer. It settles down after a while and the readings are stable to the 5th digit. I am now running at 776 uA, which is about 67uA/sq.in. The initial voltage across the cell is only about 12V, so the current limiting is instantaneous. There's enough headroom to stack 10 cells in series and still have plenty left over. > Wasn't there some caveat about making some silver compound at the > water/air interface when using these voltages? Did you paint or > coat the electrodes at the interface area? Nah. That's Bob's crazy idea. I still have the first electrodes I used for many years. The bottoms measure about 0.027 inch and the tops measure 0.080 inch. There is no necking whatsoever at the water line as he claims. If there were, everyones's electrodes would quickly wear and they would fall in the water. That has never happened:) I definitely do not recommend painting the electrodes at the waterline. You have no idea what kind of chemical reactions might go on during electrolysis. But I do recommend painting the 6-32 screws that hold the electrodes to the cover. Even with galvanizing, they tend to rust after a while. Probably due to the high humidity and long brew times. > Thanks, > Dan Best Regards, Mike Monett -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>