I agree. Any experiment such as this should have a control, and what you say
would be the control needed.  They should really be run together, the air
quality can vary signinficantly over time, so running then sequentially could
result in a false positive or negative.

Marshall

David Bearrow wrote:

> Please do a 3rd experiment. Use the same glass container, fill it with the
> same source of distilled water and let it sit for 7 days. Put nothing in
> the water (no silver rods or anything). Then check the conductivity after 7
> days. This will show if your getting impurities added via the air.
>
> At 01:57 AM 10/20/03, you wrote:
> >Hi:
> >
> >Experiment #1, Posted before said:
> >
> >The positive  silver electrode is introduced into a  DW container,
> >300cc, the other is outside the glass container.
> >
> >DW measures 1.0 u Siemens Voltage = 34V supply: Sota constant current set
> >a 1mA.
> >After 2 days, 2.4uS After 5 days, 14.0 uS and a heaviest, by far, Tyndall
> >I  have ever seen.
> >The final product have zero taste. The electrodes have no darkening or
> >coating what so ever.
> >There was no sediments.
> >The container was glass 2" in diameter by 7.5" high
> >Electrodes 12 Ga, 5.5" sum merged.
> >The voltage stay constant at 34V, there was no measurable current.
> >
> >This experiment was performed on a glass container, with electrodes, that
> >were previously used (4 times) to make CS.
> >
> >The enormous Tyndall was due , in - today's- my opinion to:
> >The release of silver particles from the container walls.
> >Since silver clusters seem to be formed from several silver molecules so
> >arranged as to present a negative charge to the outside world, when a
> >positive charged electrode is introduced in the water, the particles
> >trapped in the wall get released.
> >For the high conductivity exhibited in that experiment I have no guess at
> >this time.
> >
> >Experiment #2
> >
> >Electrode: 6 feet long coiled on a 4 inches tight coil, wiped with clean
> >paper towel and rinsed twice  with DW. Never used before.
> >
> >Container : Glass 4" diameter, 4" deep, never used before.
> >
> >PS: 58 V Wall wart. no second electrode anywhere.
> >
> >Staring conductivity = 1.0 uS
> >1 day  = 1.7 uS
> >3 days = 2.4
> >5 days = 3.3 uS
> >7 days = 3.8 uS
> >The meter was cleaned in DW before measurements.
> >Very slight Tyndall in a dark room was noticed.
> >There was no sediments, taste or change in the electrodes.
> >
> >This is not a very impressive show but the change in conductivity , still,
> >must be explained without invoking  Faraday or any electromagnetic
> >phenomenon, since a microamp meter was connected from the electrode to the
> >glass and no current was  registered.
> >
> >This of course has no use as CS production goes, perhaps it can be used to
> >clean container without solvents or touching them.
> >Further investigations may help to answer some of the very perplexing
> >questions found in the production of CS.
> >Regards
> >
> >Peter R
> >
>
> +-----   Bentonite Clay for sale    -----+
> http://pages.sbcglobal.net/davebe/clay.html
> ¦              David Bearrow             ¦
> ¦          dav...@sbcglobal.net          ¦
> +----      Phone: (972)722-8319      ----+
>
> --
> The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org
>
> To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
>
> Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
>
> List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>