Me too everyone, I just can't remember what the I stands for unless it is ionic, I know what the E and the S means. Yours Hank ----- Original Message ----- From: Richard Harris To: silver-list@eskimo.com Cc: Richard Harris Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 4:26 PM Subject: RE: CS>Brownian Motion
I applaud your support of EIS and vote to adopt this statement. EIS is appealing & doesn't have the Rosemary Connotation. Sincerely, Richard Harris, 56 yr FL Pharmacist -----Original Message----- From: Garnet [mailto:garnetri...@earthlink.net] Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 10:18 PM To: silver-list@eskimo.com Subject: Re: CS>Brownian Motion Gotta agree that the term CS has been bothering me. I feel I have to qualify my statements when I tell someone about CS, the ionic aspects and all -- and that it makes their eyes glaze over. Really all people want to know is does it work and how do I do it. Garnet On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 20:49, Jonathan B. Britten wrote: > I second the motion. EIS is a useful term and perhaps we > shouldpromote it. "CS" plays into the hands of the argyria > scaremongers. Let us make them use our terminology and then see what > evidence theycan produce. > > > JBB > > > > > > On Tuesday, Apr 13, 2004, at 19:10 Asia/Tokyo, Matthew McCann PE > wrote: > > Hi, Stuff, > > As far as the ionic fractionof EIS is concerned > (and that would seem to bemost of it,) mutual > repulsion does homogenize thesolution. So the > answer to your question isYes. > > P.S. I'm really starting tolike the distinctive > meaning of "EIS." Jasondeserves thanks for > coining it. > > Matthew
