If you see no reason to assume that man is evolving then can you support this position by stating by what assumptions you conclude that man is in a state of devolution or stasis? One of the three must be occuring and since time is nothing more than the state of constant physical change, we can safely assume it is not the process of stasis.
Garnet On Sun, 2004-04-18 at 10:44, David Bearrow wrote: > In every generation there are varying levels of IQ distributed throughout > the population. These things can be explained as a byproduct of high > intelligence. Its not necessary to explain it as higher consciousness or > mystical awareness. Occams razor states one should not make more > assumptions than the minimum needed. A child with high IQ that likes to > read has available the sum total of mans knowledge available via the web > and the library as well as visual stimuli via television. I see no reason > to assume that man is evolving. -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
