Himagain wrote: > At 03:56 AM 26/02/05, Mike wrote: > > >Dear Nina, all, > > > >Nina writes: > > > Please list your researchers and peer review of the documentation, > > > Anyone can state researchers said this or that. ... Provide > > > documentation for your statement, MAY is not scientific. ... > > ********* The vital point that most people miss is that "peer review", to > any of us who actually were or are, real scientists, is the retardant for > truth in any form! > What is needed is intelligent support. Any proposition should be able to > stand on its own rationale - within reason! :-) > Due Diligence is the responsibility of the questioner. In true debate, > requiring equal evidence in rebuttal. NEVER by recourse to > "An" "Authority". As Professor Whatsisname said conclusively, 'I would > rather err with Galen than be correct with a commoner like Harvey." > I've left the rest of Mike's erudite commentary below as it is well worth > repeating!
Absolutely. I watched the newest "Around the World in 80 Days" yesterday, and in that movie, it was as bad in the 1800's in London as it is today. A few top appointees controlled science completely, even resorting to attempted murder to maintain the status quo. At least in the movie they got their due. Marshall -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
