This is a really interesting question. Some members here report just as
effective results with 10 ppm or even lower, as with higher ppm. Some
report increased effectiveness with gatorade, or H202 added to their
EIS, but many report equally good effectiveness with straight EIS.
There is enough variability in EIS apart from the "ppm" that such
variables may account for the differences. Or perhaps it is just
individual responses to EIS that account for it. I do personally feed I
get much better effectiveness from EIS that is around 20 uS (ppm) than
EIS of 10 ppm. And for topical uses, for me, EIS of much higher than 20
uS (ppm) works much more effectively. It is also possible that I am just
a confirmed believer in the "more is better" mindset.
sol
debbie cozens wrote:
Thats what i thought too..im very interested to know why!
Pavel Hochmut <ho...@cbox.cz> wrote:
Everywhere you can hear, that the CS with higher concentration has
much more efficacy.
BUT WHY ????
Realize: If you take two teaspoons of the 10 ppm CS, your silver
intake shall be the same as if you take 1 teaspoon of the 20 ppm CS.
Or am I wrong? Where is the mistake?
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.10.3 - Release Date: 4/25/2005
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html
List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
