I didn't know that B had been around so much. I then was /not/ designed for
working with UNIX specifically?
----- Original Message -----
From: Clem Cole
To: Eric Smith
Cc: simh@trailing-edge.com
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 7:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Simh] pdp11 and unix
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 6:43 PM, Eric Smith <esmithm...@gmail.com> wrote:
It would be interesting to know how they went from B to C .. but once
they had a higher level language (C .. well, higher level compared to
the assembler), things would become much easier.
​Dennis described it all in one of his papers. NB was written in B. C
morphed into being so as he said, there was never really a "C" compiler from
scratch. At one point, they realized the language had diverged enough to call
it something else.
Also, as Doug has pointed out either here or on the TUHS list, there was an
early parser in TMG - which I believe spit out B at that point. Yacc and Lex
do not appear until later in the cycle.
The point is that the kernel and the tools "matured" as time went on. At
some point Dennis would collect up tools that people had and pick up the
current state of the kernel and "release" was come out. So it was a ephemeral
thing, not a big formal process we think of today with release candidates et
al. The bad news for us trying to pick through the history, is that it means
in some cases we really do not have an established date of references point.
Warren has done yeoman's work to try to help establish such a timeline and
probably has the most definitive track of what was what - but in some cases it
was hazy and frankly the intermediate codes have been lost.
Clem
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Simh mailing list
Simh@trailing-edge.com
http://mailman.trailing-edge.com/mailman/listinfo/simh_______________________________________________
Simh mailing list
Simh@trailing-edge.com
http://mailman.trailing-edge.com/mailman/listinfo/simh
