David Vasil wrote:
> Risto Vaarandi wrote:
>> In order to overcome this ambiguity, I've been thinking about adding 
>> event2 action to SEC action set that would have the following syntax:
>>
>> event2 <time> [<event text>]
>>
>> 'event2' would be identical to 'event', except <time> parameter is 
>> mandatory and may contain other symbols than numerals (0-9) only.
>>
>> Note that there is also another option - drop the idea of having 'event2 
>> <variable_time> <event_text>', and use
>>
>> create <context> <variable_time> (event <event_text>)
>>
>> instead. In other words, when variable lifetimes are allowed for 
>> contexts, 'event2' can be actually expressed through 'create'.
>>
>> Any ideas?
> 
> I like the idea of an additional event, but the name itself 'event2' may 
> confuse some.  Maybe something like 'tevent' for 'timed event' would 
> work.  

I had the same doubts about the naming -- adding a number doesn't make 
the name descriptive enough) --, but 'tevent' looks a nice choice ;)

 > I definitely think the event2/tevent is much cleaner than the
> create context workaround you gave for an example.
> 

OK.

br,
risto

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Simple-evcorr-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/simple-evcorr-users

Reply via email to