-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 John P. Rouillard wrote: | In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, | Risto Vaarandi writes: | |> ...and what about the licensing change from GPLv2 to v3? [...] I |> suppose moving to GPLv3 is OK by majority of list members? | | Well to tell the truth I haven't been following the whole v2/v3 | debate. However my understanding is that redistributing SEC using GPL | V2 licensed perl modules with a V3 licensed SEC is not possible.
I can not say it does so. You might want to read: http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/quick-guide-gplv3.html | -- rouilj Hmm. The standard for signature seperation says to use just DASH DASH SPACE on a single line. (An attempt to mention this in a private message was returned as undeliverable.) Hugo. - -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/ PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc A: Yes. >Q: Are you sure? >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHjvgXBvzDRVjxmYERAjbFAJ9MQoi5LhqfHCmQfth5bEtI2D2UogCcDyGO eGqJ6ZHpY1ex9KC5iPHswqQ= =5FRe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Simple-evcorr-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/simple-evcorr-users
