Hi Petr, On 05/01/12 21:39, Petr Hluzín wrote: > Why does your patch add instructionBREAKJustExecuted to AvrDevice and > then have the if() condition in AvrDevice::Step()? > It would be easier to do the tracing in avr_op_BREAK::operator()() and > return BREAK_POINT. Function AvrDevice::Step() and class AvrDevice > would be left as is. Yeah, this was what the first version of my patch did. I had to change that, because the PC was not incremented this way. Result was, your stuck at BREAK forever once you reach it.
Bye, Stan. _______________________________________________ Simulavr-devel mailing list Simulavr-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/simulavr-devel
